The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare
The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare

This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cebc4cw.org/

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) - Detailed Report

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Scientific Rating:
2 - Supported by Research Evidence

Relevance to Child Welfare Rating:
2
Relevance to Child Welfare Rating:
2 - Medium

Child Welfare Outcomes: Child/family well-being

Type of Maltreatment: Not specified

Target Population: Primarily low-income families.

Brief Description:(The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff.)

Supporting Family Involvement (SFI) has been reviewed by the CEBC in the area of Motivation and Engagement. SFI is a preventive intervention designed to enhance fathers’ positive involvement with their children. The curriculum is based on an empirically-validated family risk model. This model predicts that children’s development is predicted by risks and buffers in five interconnected domains:

  • family members’ characteristics
  • 3-generational expectations and relationship patterns
  • quality of parent-child relationship
  • quality of parents’ relationship
  • balance of stressors versus social support for the family.

The curriculum highlights the potential contributions fathers make to the family. The program is aimed at strengthening fathers’ involvement in the family, promoting healthy child development, and preventing key factors implicated in child abuse. Since SFI is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and fidelity measures was requested from the program representative. Please see the program's separate Implementation Information page for details.


Essential Components

Show Essential Components

  • The curriculum targets 5 aspects of family life for intervention to enhance fathers’ involvement:
      -both partners’ individual well-being
      -the quality of the relationship between the parents
      -the quality of relationship between parent and child
      -breaking negative cycles across generations
      -coping with life stress and enhancing social support
  • Group structure follows a curriculum but includes open-ended discussion of personal and family issues. This is not a skills training program that teaches participants that there is only one correct way to be a family.
  • Leaders are trained mental health professionals, ideally license eligible.
  • Cultural sensitivity is maintained in intervention approach, language, and curriculum materials.
  • Meetings are held at dinnertime to meet schedules of working families. Food provided.
  • Childcare is provided.
  • Case management is provided for all families.


Group Format

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) was designed to be conducted in a group.

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) has been tested for use in a group setting.

Testing references:

Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. (2007). An approach to preventing coparenting conflict and divorce in low-income families: Strengthening couple relationships and fostering fathers' involvement. Family Process, 46(1), 109-121.

The recommended group size is: Recommended for groups of 4-8 couples or 10-12 fathers, with two leaders.


Recommended Parameters

Recommended intensity: Two-hour long weekly group meetings. Case management contact advisable.

Recommended duration: 16 weeks.


Homework

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) includes a homework component.

Description: Follow-ups on the exercises and discussions in each group.


Delivery Setting

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) is typically conducted in a(n): Community Agency and School.


Parent Component

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) was designed with a Parent Component.

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms: Problems in parent-child, couple, and three-generational relationships.


Child Component

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) was designed with a Child Component.

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms: Children of fathers with parent-child, couple, or three-generational relationships.

Age range(s): 0-11

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) was not developed for children with developmental delays.

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) has not been tested for children with developmental delays.


Languages

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) does not have materials available in a language other than English.


Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program.

There is training available for Supporting Father Involvement (SFI).

Training contact: Philip A. Cowan, University of California, Berkeley, pcowan@berkeley.edu, 510-643-5608, fax 510-526-5745 or check out the training available on http://familyresourcecenters.net/

Number of days/hours: Informal consultation currently available

Training is obtained: Information consultation currently available

There currently are not additional qualified resources for training.


Identified Resources Necessary to Implement Program

The typical resources for implementing Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) are: Meeting room space adequate for groups of 10-18 adult participants and leaders. Additional space for providing childcare has been very much appreciated by staff and parents.


Minimum Provider Qualifications

Group leaders need clinical training at the Master's Level or equivalent - licensed or license-eligible. Supervisors must be licensed mental health professionals.


Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

Show Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

Supporting Father Involvement (SFI) is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. For more information on the rating of a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence," please see the Scientific Rating Scale.


Cowan, P.A., Cowan, C. P., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. D., & Wong, J. (2009). Promoting fathers' engagement with children: Preventive interventions for low-income families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 71, 663-679.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial.
Number of participants: 371 couples
Population:

    Age Range: Families with children 0-7 years
    Race/Ethnicity: 67% Mexican American, 27% European American, 6% other.
    Status (e.g., foster care, CW): Families recruited through Family Resource Centers, other county service agencies and community events.

Location/Institution: California
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Families were recruited to participate in an intervention aimed at improving father engagement in childrearing. Recruited families were excluded if screening suggested mental illness, drug or alcohol abuse problems, or if they were currently involved in an open case with Child Protective Services. Participants were randomly assigned to a 16-week fathers’ group, a 16-week couples group, or a comparison group that only attended a single informational meeting. All participating families also had access to a case manager, who could make needed referrals to services and follow-up with regard to attendance at training sessions. Measures developed by the authors included a self-reported estimate of father-child relationship and parents’ self-ratings of division of labor in childcare. Parents also completed the Parenting Stress Inventory (PSI), the Ideas About Parenting Questionnaire, and the Quality of Marriage Index. Children’s behavior problems were assessed with the Child Adaptive Behavior Inventory. Results showed that parents in the 16-week group training conditions reported more stable perceptions of children’s problem behaviors and those in the couples groups reported more stable levels of relationship satisfaction. No effects were found for parenting attitudes. Limitations include self-report measures and use of a screened convenience sample.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: 11 months after group interventions, 18 months after single session.



References

Show References

Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. (2005). Encouraging strong relationships between fathers and children. Working Strategies, 8(4), 1-11.

Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. (2007). An approach to preventing coparenting conflict and divorce in low-income families: Strengthening couple relationships and fostering fathers' involvement. Family Process, 46(1), 109-121.

Cowan, P. A., Cowan, C. P., Cohen, N., Pruett, M. K., & Pruett, K. (2008). Supporting fathers' engagement with their kids. In J. D. Berrick & N. Gilbert (Eds.), Raising children: Emerging needs, modern risks, and social responses (pp. 44-80). New York: Oxford University Press.

Pruett, M. K., Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Pruett, K. (2009). A cross-cultural preventive intervention for low-income families with young children. Journal of Social Services Research, 35, 163-169.

Pruett, M. K., Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Pruett, K. (2009). Fathers as resources in families involved in the child welfare system. Protecting Children, 24, 52-65.



Contact Information

Contact name: Philip A. Cowan

Affiliation/Agency: University of California, Berkeley

Email: pcowan@berkeley.edu

Phone: 510-643-5608

Fax: 510-526-5745


Date reviewed: April 2009 (originally rated in June 2008)