This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cebc4cw.org/
Child Welfare Outcomes: Child/family well-being
Type of Maltreatment: Not specified
Target Population: Adults age 18 or older with a diagnosis of cocaine abuse or dependence
Brief Description:(The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff.)
The Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) has been rated by the CEBC in the area of Substance Abuse Treatment (Adult). CRA + Vouchers has two main components. The Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) component is an intensive psychosocial therapy emphasizing changes in substance use; vocation; social and recreational practices; and coping skills. The Voucher Approach is a contingency- management intervention where clients earn material incentives for remaining in treatment and sustaining cocaine abstinence verified by urine toxicology testing. Since CRA + Vouchers is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and fidelity measures was requested from the program representative. Please see the program's separate Implementation Information page for details.
The Voucher Program
Counseling Component
(Essential Components for CRA + Vouchers program were obtained from the National Institute on Drug Abuse website.)
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) was not designed to be conducted in a group.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) has not been tested for use in a group setting.
Recommended intensity: Depending on where they are in treatment, clients are seen for therapy between 2 (or more) times a week and once a month and provide urine samples between 3 times a week and once a month.
Recommended duration: Therapy session duration depends on the client’s needs and the nature of the goals for the particular session. Generally, sessions are 60 minutes. The recommended treatment duration is 24 weeks of treatment and 24 weeks of aftercare. During weeks 1-12 of treatment, clients are asked to visit the clinic to provide urine samples for drug screens three times per week and have individual therapy sessions at least two times a week. During weeks 12-24, the intensity of treatment is decreased to urine toxicology testing twice a week and therapy sessions once a week. After the 24-weeks of treatment, a 24-week period of “aftercare” is recommended, involving at least one check-in session a month, a brief therapy session and a urine toxicology test.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) includes a homework component.
Description: A primary goal of the program is behavior and lifestyle change. This is an intensive treatment in which patients need to be extremely active participants. During treatment planning and throughout individual sessions, the therapist and client create between-session goals. The goals are in the areas of developing new and healthier social networks, recreational activities, family relationships, and vocational direction. The first order of business of each session is review of the patient’s follow-through on their daily and weekly goals.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) is typically conducted in a(n): Outpatient Clinic.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) was not designed with a Parent Component.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) was not designed with a Child Component.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) was not developed for children with developmental delays.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) has not been tested for children with developmental delays.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) does not have materials available in a language other than English.
There is a manual that describes how to implement this program.
There is not training available for Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers).
The typical resources for implementing Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) are: Staffing needs: two therapists, one program manager, one data manager, one research assistant, one secretary, one post-doctoral fellow and one supervisory psychologist.
Space/room requirements: sufficient to accommodate each of the staff members and to provide sufficient privacy for the patients. It is also necessary to have onsite biochemical verification in order to immediately detect cocaine use.
Therapists need a Master’s degree and supervision by a licensed Ph.D.-level Psychologist. Research assistants need to have a Bachelor’s degree.
Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA + Vouchers) is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. For more information on the rating of a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence," please see the Scientific Rating Scale.
Higgins, S. T., Delaney, D. D., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., Hughes, J. R., Foerg, F., et al. (1991). A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 148(9), 1218-1224.
Type of Study: Unmatched comparison group
Number of participants: 28
Population:
Location/Institution: Not given.
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) This study compared participants treated with a Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA+V) enabling them earn money to purchase desired items, with those treated using a traditional 12-step approach. Drug use was monitored with urinalysis and breath alcohol screening 4 times per week during treatment. Patients in the CRA+V condition maintained abstinence from cocaine longer than those in the 12-step condition. However, there was a significantly higher rate of marijuana use in the behavioral group. Groups did not differ in rates of other drug use during the study period. The CRA+V group also had a greater rate of retention than the 12-step group. This study is limited by a small sample size and lack of randomization to groups.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: None
Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., Hughes, J. R., Foerg, F., & Badger, G. (1993). Achieving cocaine abstinence with a behavioral approach. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(5), 763-769.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 38
Population:
Location/Institution: Not given
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Participants were randomly assigned to receive either the Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA+V) or counseling. The counseling condition combined initial individual counseling with later 12-step group attendance. Drug use was checked using urinalysis. A significantly greater number of the CRA+V group completed 24 weeks of treatment (58% versus 11%) and a greater proportion had maintained sobriety at 8 at 16 weeks. The authors note that this sample did not contain crack cocaine users. The sample was also primarily Caucasian and results may not generalize to other populations.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: None
Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., Foerg, F. E., Donham, R., & Badger, G. J (1994). Incentives improve outcome in outpatient behavioral treatment of cocaine dependence. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 568-576.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 40
Population:
Location/Institution: Not given
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Participants were randomly assigned to receive the Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA+V) with vouchers equivalent to specified amounts of money contingent on negative urine tests. Voucher amounts increased over time as periods of abstinence increased. The No-Voucher group also received the CRA procedure, but were only informed of the outcome of their uninalysis. At 24 weeks, end of treatment assessments were proformed. The CRA+V group maintained sobriety significantly longer than the no-voucher group, with 30% of patients reaching 20 weeks versus 5% for the no-voucher group. More patients in the voucher group also completed the full 24 weeks of treatment (75% versus 40%). Finally, at the end of treatment the voucher group had significantly better scores on the Drug scale of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and also showed improvement on the ASI Psychiatric Scale. This study is limited by lack of a no-treatment or standard treatment control group.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.
Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J., Bickel, W. K., Badger, G. J., Foerg, F. E., & Ogden, D. (1995). Outpatient behavioral treatment for cocaine dependence: One-year outcome. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 3(2), 205-212.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 78
Population:
Location/Institution: Not given
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Note: This follow-up uses the samples from Higgins et al., 1993 and Higgins, Budney, Bickel, Foerg, et al, 1994. Two randomized controlled trials were conducted comparing the Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA+V) procedure to other treatments. In Trial 1 the CRA+V was compared to a standard 12-step approach. In Trial 2, the CRA+V was compared to CRA without vouchers. Follow-up assessments were taken at 9 months and 1 year after treatment. Assessments included urinalysis, self-reported abstinence, aftercare participation and scores on the Addiction Severity Index (ASI), a structured interview looking at alcohol use, drug use, employment, family-social issues, legal issues, and medical/psychiatric issues. Looking at Trial 1ignificantly more participants in the voucher condition were abstaining from cocaine at 6, 9 and 12 months than in the 12-step counseling condition and they were more likely to enter aftercare. There were no differences between groups in scores on the ASI. For Trial 2, both the CRA+Vand non-voucher CRA groups showed equivalent rates of abstinence at 6, 9, and 12 months and comparable ASI scores. However, more patients in the voucher group enrolled in aftercare.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: 1 year
Bickel, W. K., Marsch, L. A., Buchhalter, A. R., & Badger, G. J. (2008). Computerized behavior therapy for opioid-dependent outpatients: A randomized controlled trial. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 16(2), 132-143.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 135
Population:
Location/Institution: Not given
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Participants were randomly assigned to a Community Reinforcement + Vouchers Approach (CRA+V) program or to a program containing the same essential elements but delivered via self-directed computer modules. A third group was randomly assigned to receive standard methadone treatment and counseling. Outcome measures included drug abstinence, defined as three consecutive negative urine samples per week, treatment retention, Addiction Severity Index (ASI) score, score on the Helping Alliance Questionnaire-Patient Version (HAQ-P), which measures the degree of helping relationship between therapist and patient. The regular and computer-assisted CRA+V conditions showed comparable rates of continuous abstinence (7.98 and 7.78 weeks on average, respectively) and significantly higher rates than the standard methadone treatment (4.69 weeks on average). All groups showed similar rates of treatment retention and similar ASI and HAQ-P scores.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: None
Budney, A. & Higgins, S. T. (1994). A community reinforcement plus vouchers approach: Treating cocaine addiction (NIDA Publication No. 98-4309 ed.). Rockville, Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Higgins, S. T., Alessi, S. M., & Dantona, R. L. (2002). Voucher-based incentives: A substance abuse treatment innovation. Addictive Behaviors, 27, 887-910.
Lussier, J. P., Heil, S. H., Mongeon, J. A., Badger, J. G. & Higgins, S. T. (2006). A meta-analysis of voucher-based reinforcement therapy for substance use disorders. Addiction, 101, 192-203.
Contact name: Stephen T. Higgins, PhD
Email: shiggins@uvm.edu
Phone: 802-656-9615
Fax: 802-847-4891
Website: http://www.drugabuse.gov/TXManuals/CRA/CRA1.html