This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cebc4cw.org/
Child Welfare Outcomes: Safety and child/family well-being.
Type of Maltreatment: Emotional abuse, Exposure to domestic violence, and Physical abuse
Target Population: Families (mothers and children) who had recently sought refuge at domestic violence shelters, with children aged 4-9 exhibiting clinical levels of elevations on externalizing problems (e.g., disruptive, defiant behaviors).
Brief Description:(The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff.)
Project SUPPORT has been rated by the CEBC in the area of Domestic/Intimate Partner Violence: Services for Women Victims and their Children. Project SUPPORT was developed to address child conduct problems (i.e., disruptive, oppositional behaviors). Specifically, it was designed for individual families (mother and child(ren)) in which the mother had sought refuge at a woman's shelter because of domestic violence and at least one of her children was exhibiting clinical levels of conduct problems. The intervention includes two main components: providing instrumental and emotional support to the mother during her transition from the women's shelter and teaching the mother to implement a set of child management and nurturing skills that have been shown to be effective in the treatment of clinical levels of conduct problems. Since Project SUPPORT is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and fidelity measures was requested from the program representative. Please see the program's separate Implementation Information page for details.
Project SUPPORT is a home-based intervention that includes two primary components:
Project SUPPORT delivery method:
Child Management and Nurturing Skills Component
Social and Instrumental Support Component
Project SUPPORT was not designed to be conducted in a group.
Project SUPPORT has not been tested for use in a group setting.
Recommended intensity: Weekly 1-1.5 hour sessions with flexibility in scheduling to address crises that emerge.
Recommended duration: 26 weeks
Project SUPPORT includes a homework component.
Description: Mothers practice parenting techniques between sessions.
Project SUPPORT is typically conducted in a(n): Birth Family Home.
Project SUPPORT was designed with a Parent Component.
Project SUPPORT addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms: Domestic violence victims who have lived in a women’s shelter.
Project SUPPORT was designed with a Child Component.
Project SUPPORT addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms: Externalizing problems.
Age range(s): 4-9
Project SUPPORT was not developed for children with developmental delays.
Project SUPPORT has not been tested for children with developmental delays.
Project SUPPORT does not have materials available in a language other than English.
There is a manual that describes how to implement this program.
There is training available for Project SUPPORT.
Training contact: Dr. Ernest Jouriles: 214-363-3162
Number of days/hours: Informal training/consultation is available to those who are interested.
Training is obtained: Via phone consultation
There currently are not additional qualified resources for training.
The typical resources for implementing Project SUPPORT are: None are specifically required.
Therapists: Master’s level degree
Supervisors: PhD level degree
Project SUPPORT is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. For more information on the rating of a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence," please see the Scientific Rating Scale.
Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., Spiller, L., Norwood, W. D., Swank, P. R., Stephens, N., et al. (2001). Reducing conduct problems among children of battered women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(5), 774-785.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled triall
Number of participants: 36 families
Population:
Location/Institution: Texas
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Women and their children were recruited from shelter programs. To meet study requirements, children had to have a diagnosis of oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) or conduct disorder (CD) based on Diagnostic and Statistics Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Women and children in the intervention condition were provided with support services and parent training. Families in the comparison condition were encouraged to use existing community and shelter services. Mothers were assessed for history of violence during the previous 12 months using the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). Follow-up measures included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Symptom Checklist-90 to assess mothers’ psychological distress, as well as video-taped observation of child management skills. Compared with families receiving services as usual, children in the intervention condition improved at a faster rate, the proportion of conduct problems was diminished, and mothers displayed greater improvement in child management skills. The authors note that although children’s behavior improved, CBCL externalizing scores remained at clinical levels.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: 16 months.
McDonald, R., Jouriles, E. N., & Skopp, N. A. (2006). Reducing conduct problems among children brought to women’s shelters: Effects 24 months following termination of services. Journal of Family Psychology, 20(1), 127-136.
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 30 families
Population:
Location/Institution: Texas
Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) Note: This study uses the same sample as Jouriles, et al., 2001. Mothers in the Project Support condition received parent training targeted at child conduct problems. Follow-up assessments were conducted during home visits. Mothers reported on children’s disruptive behavior during an interview which included the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Mothers also responded to items from the Health Resources Inventory to assess children’s happiness and social relationships and to items from the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) to assess their own aggression towards their children. Finally, they reported on contact with their partner and any recurrence of physical violence. Children in the Project Support condition were less likely to be having conduct problems, and had higher happiness scores. Mothers in the treatment condition reported les aggression and were less likely to have returned to an abusive partner. There were no group differences in recurrence of physical violence. The authors note that the study’s measures of children’s adjustment and of family functioning were limited.
Length of post-intervention follow-up: 24 months.
Ezell, E., McDonald, R., & Jouriles, E. N. (2000). Helping children of battered women: A review of research, sampling of programs, and presentation of Project Support. In J. Vincent & E. Jouriles (Eds.), Domestic violence: Guidelines for research-informed practice (pp.144-170). London: Kingsley Publishers.
Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., Stephens, N., Norwood, W., Spiller, L. C., & Ware, H. S. (1998). Breaking the cycle of violence: Helping families departing from battered women's shelters. In G. Holden, R. Geffner, & Jouriles, E. N. (Eds.), Children exposed to marital violence: Theory, research, and applied issues (pp. 185-221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Contact name: Ernest N. Jouriles, PhD
Affiliation/Agency: Southern Methodist University
Email: ejourile@smu.edu
Phone: 214-363-3162
Fax: 214-768-0821