Home  «  Program  «  Building Confidence  « 

Building Confidence

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Building Confidence program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Anxiety Treatment (Child & Adolescent).

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Typically developing school-aged children diagnosed with childhood anxiety disorders (6-11 years old) and their families.

Building Confidence is a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) that is provided to school-aged children who demonstrate clinically significant symptoms of a range of anxiety disorders (e.g., separation anxiety disorder). The format consists of individual child therapy combined with parent-training and involvement. The goal is to enhance the learning and maintenance of treatment strategies via child and parent involvement in treatment. Both children and their parents are taught fundamental CBT principles and techniques as well as integrating ways to build confidence through graduated learning and practice of age-appropriate self-independence skills. In-session exposures are extended into the home where parents assist children complete home-based exposures in the community by providing coaching in CBT strategies and naturalistic opportunities to practice and maintain treatment goals and effects. In line with these overarching treatment goals, the intervention program also works closely with the children’s schools and teachers to promote the practice and generalization of treatment goals in the school (e.g., social anxiety).

Essential Components

The essential components of Building Confidence include:

  • Assessment of anxiety and age-appropriate self-help skill milestones
  • Development hierarchy to gradually help child build confidence to anxiety provoking situations (including areas of self-help) and obtaining child/parent ratings
  • Developing in-session and home-based exposure tasks that are implemented in real-word settings (i.e., not based only within the therapy setting)
  • Providing psychoeducation to parents and training on CBT strategies for parents to “coach” children to develop confidence and manage anxiety symptoms
  • Developing close partnerships and collaborative working relationship with school and key personnel (e.g., teachers) to bridge the gap between clinic, home, and school goals and provide real-life opportunities to build confidence and success with CBT skills and anxiety management (e.g., teacher provides opportunities for skills being learned in treatment and provides additional monitoring of acquisition and maintenance of skills)
  • The use of humor and rewards to build skills and develop positive and meaningful experiences in which they are confident and successfully manage anxiety symptoms

Child Component

Building Confidence was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Childhood anxiety disorders—Specifically, separation anxiety disorder, social anxiety, obsessive-compulsive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.

Age range: 7 – 11

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays; but has been tested for children with developmental delays.

Relevant research studies:

Wood, J. J., Drahota, A., Sze, K., Van Dyke, M., Decker, K., Fujii, C., Bahng, C., Renno, P., Hwang, W., & Spiker, M. (2009). Brief report: Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on parent-reported autism symptoms in school-age children with high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(11), 1608-1612.

Wood, J. J., Drahota, A., Sze, K., Har, K., Chiu, A., & Langer, D. A. (2009). Cognitive behavioral therapy for anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(3), 224-234.

Sze, K. M., & Wood, J. J. (2008). Enhancing CBT for the treatment of autism spectrum disorders and concurrent anxiety. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 36(4), 403-409.

Sze, K. M., & Wood, J. J. (2007). Cognitive behavioral treatment of comorbid anxiety disorders and social difficulties in children with high-functioning autism: A case report. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 37(3), 133-143.

Treatment Involves Family/Support Structures:

This program involves the family or other support systems in the individual's treatment: Parents are provided with psychoeducation about anxiety, independence skills, and CBT strategies to both help coach children during home-based exposures and provided opportunities to target treatment goals with the natural setting of the home, community, etc. The school system is also elicited as a support system so that key school personnel (e.g., teachers) can provide opportunities for treatment goals and monitoring of the child with the school environment.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Building Confidence was not designed with a parent/caregiver component.

Group Format

Building Confidence was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Community Daily Living Settings
  • Outpatient Clinic
  • School

Homework

Building Confidence includes a homework component:

Homework is given at weekly sessions.

Languages

Building Confidence does not have materials available in a language other than English.

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

Clinicians, confederates (e.g., university students or other staff who can serve as confederates for exposure activities), access to local community settings (e.g., restaurants or stores), access to a telephone (for exposures requiring phone calls), treatment room and waiting area, assistants to supervise or watch the child while therapist conducts the parent portion of the treatment session, child appropriate games or toys, child appropriate rewards (e.g., edibles, stickers), tape recorder to record sessions, paper and writing materials to create homework sheets or session materials.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Experience working in clinical setting with children and families; experience with cognitive-behavioral interventions; and at least a Master’s level clinical training experience.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training is obtained:

Provided in Los Angeles or remotely (online)

Number of days/hours:

4-6 hours

Implementation Information

Since Building Confidence is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

To be given to organizations or providers in order to measure organizational or individual readiness:

There are no pre-implementation assessments.

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

An unpublished manual for implementing the intervention exists and available upon request in PDF format.

Fidelity Measures

A fidelity measure exists to assess for clinician fidelity based on audiotaped recordings of each session which is available upon request.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Wood, J. J., Piacentini, J. C., Southam-Gerow, M., Chu, B. C., & Sigman, M. (2006). Family cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(3), 314-321.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 40

Population:

  • Age range — 6 to 13 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Caucasian (24), Hispanic (4), African American (1), Asian/Pacific Islander (1), and Other (9)
  • Gender — 24 Males, 16 Females
  • Status — Participants were parents and children with anxiety disorders from a major metropolitan area of the western United States referred through school psychologists, principals, and a child anxiety clinic.

Location / Institution: University of California, Los Angeles

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Parents and children were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups: family-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (the Building Confidence Program) or traditional child-focused CBT with minimal family involvement for children with anxiety disorders. The Building Confidence Program group received parent communication training. Measures used included the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-CP), Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI), and the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC). Follow-up assessments occurred in the middle of treatment for self-report and parent-report measures only, and at posttreatment for all measures. Results indicated that parent reports and independent evaluator ratings suggest that, when compared with an individual child-focused treatment, Building Confidence Program produced greater symptom reduction and improved functioning at posttreatment. Limitations included the lack of post-intervention follow-up.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Wood, J. J., McLeod, B. D., Piacentini, J. C., & Sigman, M. (2009). One-year follow-up of family versus child CBT for anxiety disorders: Exploring the roles of child age and parental intrusiveness. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 40(2), 301-316.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 35

Population:

  • Age range — 6 to 13 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Caucasian (69%), Multi-racial (21%), Hispanic (3%), African American (3%), and Asian (3%)
  • Gender — 66% Male, 34% Female
  • Status — Participants were parents and children with anxiety disorders who participated in the 2006 Wood et al. study.

Location / Institution: University of California, Los Angeles

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study is a follow-up of the Wood et al 2006 study summarized above. This study compared the relative long-term benefit of family-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (FCBT; Building Confidence Program) and child-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT) for child anxiety disorders. Parents and children completed the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule (ADIS-CP), Clinical Global Impressions Improvement Scale (CGI), Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children (MASC), and the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Results indicated that children assigned to Building Confidence Program had lower anxiety scores than children assigned to CCBT on follow-up diagnostician- and parent-report scores, but not child-report scores, and that Building Confidence Program may yield a stronger treatment effect than CCBT that lasts for at least 1 year.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 1 year.

Chiu, A. W., McLeod, B. D., Har, K., & Wood, J. J. (2009). Child–therapist alliance and clinical outcomes in cognitive behavioral therapy for child anxiety disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(6), 751-758.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 34

Population:

  • Age range — 6 to 13 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Caucasian (62%), Latino (6%), Asian (3%), African American (3%), and Multiracial (26%).
  • Gender — 24 Males, 10 Females
  • Status — Participants were parents and children with anxiety disorders who participated in the Wood et al. (2006) study.

Location / Institution: University of California, Los Angeles

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
This study used the same sample as the Wood et al. (2006) study (summarized above) to examine the nature and strength of the alliance–outcome association in CBT for child anxiety. Families were randomly assigned to Building Confidence Program or child-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (CCBT). The CCBT and Building Confidence Program conditions did not differ in treatment dosage or fidelity. The Therapy Process Observational Coding System for Child Psychotherapy – Alliance Scale (TPOCS-A) was used to measure the quality of the child alliance and coders independently rated 123 CBT therapy sessions. Results indicated that a stronger child–therapist alliance early in treatment predicted greater improvement in parent-reported outcomes at mid-treatment but not post-treatment. However, improvement in the child–therapist alliance over the course of treatment predicted better post-treatment outcomes. Limitations included lack of child-reported measures as well as small sample size.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

References

No reference materials are currently available for Building Confidence.

Contact Information

Name: Jeffrey James Wood
Website: www.semel.ucla.edu/autism/research
Email:

Date Reviewed: April 2011