Home  «  Program  «  Cognitive Therapy  « 

Cognitive Therapy (CT)

Scientific Rating:
1
Well-Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Cognitive Therapy (CT) program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Depression Treatment (Adult).

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Adults with mental health disorders including depression, anger, and anxiety among others. The program is also designed to include family members in the treatment.

Cognitive Therapy (CT) has been rated by the CEBC in the area of Depression Treatment (Adult). CT is a form of psychotherapy proven in numerous clinical trials to be effective for a wide variety of disorders. The therapist and client work together as a team to identify and solve problems. Therapists help clients to overcome their difficulties by changing their thinking, behavior, and emotional responses. CT and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy are often used interchangeably. There are, however, numerous subsets of CBT that are narrower in scope than CT: e.g., problem-solving therapy, stress-inoculation therapy, motivational interviewing, dialectical behavior therapy, behavioral modification, exposure and response prevention, etc. Cognitive therapy uses techniques from all these subsets at times, within a cognitive framework. CT was developed by the Academy of Cognitive Therapy’s president, Aaron T. Beck, MD, in the early 1960s.

Essential Components

  • Based on the cognitive model, which is, simply that the way a person perceives a situation influences how he/she feels emotionally.
  • Focused on the present.
  • Time-limited.
  • Problem-solving oriented.
  • Patients learn specific skills that they can use for the rest of their lives: identifying distorted thinking, modifying beliefs, relating to others in different ways, and changing behaviors.

Child Component

Cognitive Therapy (CT) was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Parents with anger, anxiety, depression, and other emotional problems.

Age range: 6 – 17

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Cognitive Therapy (CT) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Anger, anxiety, depression and other emotional problems.

Group Format

Cognitive Therapy (CT) was designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has been tested for use in a group setting.

Recommended group size:

8-12

Testing References:

Dobson, K. S. (1989). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 414-419.

Gould, R. A., Otto, M. W., Pollack, M. H., & Yap, L. (1997). Cognitive behavioral and pharmacological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary meta-analysis. Behavior Therapy, 28, 285-305.

Westbrook, D., & Kirk, J. (2005). The clinical effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy: outcome for a large sample of adults in routine practice. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1243-1261.

Delivery Setting

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Outpatient Clinic

Homework

Cognitive Therapy (CT) includes a homework component:

Psychotherapy may be supplemented with cognitive therapy readings, workbooks, client pamphlets, etc. The patient may also be asked to prepare carefully for each session, thinking about what he/she learned in the previous session and jotting down what he/she wants to discuss in the next session. The patient is also encouraged to bring the therapy session into his/her everyday life. A good way to do this is to have the patient take notes at the end of each session. Other options include recording the session or providing a summary of the session on audiotape.  The therapist can then discuss homework options for the coming week with the patient.

Languages

Cognitive Therapy (CT) does not have materials available in a language other than English.

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Private room where therapy can occur.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

  • Master's degree (or international equivalent) in a mental health, medical, or allied health profession.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
Training is obtained:

State-of-the-art training for professionals in CBT provided at Beck Institute, in suburban Philadelphia. Training conducted by Aaron T. Beck, MD, and Judith S. Beck, PhD, and other senior faculty. Extramural supervision after the training is provided. Also, faculty travel to off-site locations around the U.S. and the world.

Number of days/hours:

Varying.

Additional Resources:

There currently are additional qualified resources for training:

Implementation Information

Since Cognitive Therapy (CT) is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

There are no pre-implementation assessments to measure organizational or individual provider readiness.

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

There is a manual for the program: Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.

Fidelity Measures

There is a fidelity measure called the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale. The scale and manual are available in pdf versions off of the following website page: www.beckinstitute.org/FolderID/198/InfoID/480/PageVars/Library/InfoManage/Guide.htm

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "1 - Well-Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least two rigorous randomized controlled trials with one showing a sustained effect of at least 1 year. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Numerous studies have been conducted of CT. The studies described below (meta-analyses and peer-reviewed, published articles) are a selection of those that examined the long-term effects of CT.

Several meta-analyses have been conducted on CT:

  • Dobson, K. S. (1989). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of Cognitive Therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 414-419.
  • Gaffan, E. A., Tsaousis, I., & Kemp-Wheeler, S. M. (1995) Researcher allegiance and meta-analysis: The case of Cognitive Therapy for depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 966–980.
  • Gloaguen, V., Cottraux, J., Cucherat, M., & Blackburn, I. (1998). A meta-analysis of the effects of Cognitive Therapy in depressed patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 49, 59-72.

Evans, M. D., Hollon, S. D., Garvey, M. J., Piasecki, J. M., Grove, W. M., Garvey, M. J., & Tuason, V. B. (1982). Differential relapse following Cognitive Therapy and pharmacotherapy for depression. Archives of General Psychiatry; 49, 802–808.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 50

Population:

  • Age range — Not specified, listed as "early 30s"
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not specified, listed as primarily White
  • Gender — Not specified, listed as primarily female
  • Status — Nonbipolar, nonpsychotic depressed outpatients requesting treatment for depression.

Location / Institution: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis and Department of Psychiatry St Paul – Ramsey Medical Center

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Patients successfully treated during a 3-month period with either imipramine hydrochloride pharmacotherapy, Cognitive Therapy (CT), or combined CT and pharmacotherapy were monitored during a 2-year posttreatment follow-up period. Half of the patients treated with pharmacotherapy alone continued to receive study medications for the first year of the follow-up. All other patients discontinued treatment at the end of the acute treatment phase. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and the Raskin Depression Scale. Patients treated with CT (either alone or in combination with medication) evidenced less than half the rate of relapse shown by patients in the medication--no continuation condition, and their rate did not differ from that of patients provided with continuation medication. It appears that providing CT during acute treatment prevents relapse.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years post-treatment.

Blackburn, I. M., & Moore, R. G. (1997). Controlled acute and follow-up trial of Cognitive Therapy and pharmacotherapy in out-patients with recurrent depression. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 328–334.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 75

Population:

  • Age range — Mean age range 37.8 – 40.1 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Patients were recruited from out-patient referrals to consultants in a large teaching psychiatric hospital, and from two general practices.

Location / Institution: Department of Psychiatry. University of Edinburgh

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Patients were allocated to three groups: 6 weeks of acute treatment and two years' maintenance treatment in the following way: antidepressants and maintenance antidepressants; Cognitive Therapy (CT) and maintenance cognitive therapy; antidepressants and maintenance cognitive therapy. Both completers' and end-point data were analyzed. In the acute phase of treatment, all patients improved significantly and there was no significant difference among treatments, or in the pattern of improvement over time. In the maintenance stage of treatment, patients kept improving over time in all three groups and there was no significant difference among treatments. CT was consistently superior to medication. The results indicate that maintenance cognitive therapy has a similar prophylactic effect to maintenance medication and is a viable option for maintenance after acute treatment with medication in recurrent depression.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 20 months after end of acute phase.

Paykel, E. S., Scott, J., Teasdale, J. D., Johnson, A. L., Garland, A., Moore, R., … Pope, M. (1999). Prevention of relapse in residual depression by Cognitive Therapy: A controlled trial. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 829-835.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 158

Population:

  • Age range — Mean age: 43 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — 50% male
  • Status — Participants were recruited from psychiatric outpatient clinics in Cambridge and Newcastle, England.

Location / Institution: Departments of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland; University of Newcastle, Newcastle, England; and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit and Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge Institute of Public Health.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Patients with recent major depression, partially remitted with antidepressant treatment but with residual symptoms of 2 to 18 months’ duration, were randomized to receive clinical management alone or clinical management plus Cognitive Therapy (CT) for 16 sessions during 20 weeks, with 2 subsequent booster sessions. Subjects were assessed regularly throughout the 20 weeks’ treatment and for a further year; measures included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Beck Depression Inventory. They received continuation and maintenance antidepressants at the same dose throughout. CT reduced relapse rates for acute major depression and persistent severe residual symptoms, in both intention to treat and treated per protocol samples. The cumulative relapse rate at 68 weeks was reduced significantly from 47% in the clinical management control group to 29% with CT. CT also increased full remission rates at 20 weeks but did not significantly improve symptom ratings.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 1 year after end of treatment.

Bockting, C. L. H., Schene, A. H., Spinhoven, P., Koeter, M. W. J., Wouters, L. F., Huyser, J., & Kamphuis, J. H. (2005). Preventing relapse/recurrence in recurrent depression with Cognitive Therapy: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 647-657.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 187

Population:

  • Age range — Mean age: Treatment: 45.9 years Control: 43.4 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 98-99% White
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Participants were recruited from February 2000 through September 2000 at psychiatric centers (31% of the participants) and through media announcements (69% of the participants) in the Netherlands.

Location / Institution: Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
This article reports on the outcome of a randomized controlled trial of group Cognitive Therapy (CT) to prevent relapse/recurrence in high-risk patients diagnosed with recurrent depression. Recurrently depressed patients currently in remission and following various types of treatment were randomized to treatment as usual, including continuation of pharmacotherapy, or to treatment as usual augmented with brief CT. Relapse/recurrence to major depression was assessed over 2 years. Measures included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD), the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, and the Everyday Problem Checklist. Augmenting treatment as usual with CT resulted in a significant protective effect, which intensified with the number of previous depressive episodes experienced. For patients with 5 or more previous episodes (41% of the sample), CT reduced relapse/recurrence from 72% to 46%. The findings extend the accumulating evidence that cognitive interventions following remission can be useful in preventing relapse/recurrence in patients with recurrent depression.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years.

Hollon, S. D., DeRubeis, R. J., Shelton, R. C., Amsterdam, J. D., Salomon, R. M., O’Reardon, J. P., … Gallop, R. (2005). Prevention of relapse following cognitive therapy vs. medications in moderate to severe depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 62, 417-422.

Type of Study: Follow-up to a randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 104

Population:

  • Age range — Mean age: 40 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 82% White
  • Gender — 59% female
  • Status — Participants were patients with moderate to severe unipolar depression aged 18 to 70 years who were recruited from outpatient psychiatric clinics.

Location / Institution: Outpatient clinics at the University of Pennsylvania and Vanderbilt University.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Patients who responded to CT in a randomized controlled trial were withdrawn from treatment and compared during a 12-month period with medication responders who had been randomly assigned to either continuation medication or placebo withdrawal. Patients who survived the continuation phase without relapse were withdrawn from all treatment and observed across a subsequent 12-month naturalistic follow-up. Relapse was defined as a return, for at least 2 weeks, of symptoms sufficient to meet the criteria for major depression or Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores of 14 or higher during the continuation phase. Recurrence was defined in a comparable fashion during the subsequent naturalistic follow-up. Patients withdrawn from CT were significantly less likely to relapse during continuation than patients withdrawn from medications, and no more likely to relapse than patients who kept taking continuation. There were also indications that the effect of CT extends to the prevention of recurrence.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years.

Floyd, M., Rohen, N., Shackelford, J. A. M., Hubbard, K. L., Parnell, M. B., Scogin, F., & Coates, A. (2006). Two-year follow-Up of bibliotherapy and individual Cognitive Therapy for depressed older adults. Behavior Modification, 30, 281-294.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 23

Population:

  • Age range — 60 years of age or older
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Older adults recruited from the community

Location / Institution: Tuscaloosa, Alabama, and Birmingham, Alabama

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
This study examined the stability of treatment gains after receiving either cognitive bibliotherapy or individual Cognitive Therapy (CT) for depression in older adults. A 2-year follow-up of participants was conducted by comparing pre- and posttreatment scores with follow-up scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Results indicated that treatment gains from baseline to the 2-year follow-up period were maintained on the HRSD and GDS, and there was not a significant decline from posttreatment to follow-up. There were no significant differences between the treatments on the GDS or HRSD at the 2-year follow-up; however, bibliotherapy participants had significantly more recurrences of depression during the follow-up period.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years.

Dobson, K. S., Hollon, S. D., Dimidjian, S., Schmaling, K. B., Kohlenberg, R. J., Gallop, R. J., Rizvi, S. L., … Jacobson, N. S. (2008). Randomized trial of behavioral activation, Cognitive Therapy, and antidepressant medication in the prevention of relapse and recurrence in major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(3), 468-477.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 241

Population:

  • Age range — Mean age 39.9 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 81.7% Caucasian
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Participants for this study consisted of adult outpatients who responded to acute phase treatment for depression from the Dimidjian et al. (2006) study.

Location / Institution: Seattle, WA

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
This study followed treatment responders from a randomized controlled trial of adults with major depression. Patients treated with medication but withdrawn onto pill-placebo had more relapse through 1 year of follow-up compared to patients who received prior behavioral activation, prior Cognitive Therapy (CT) , or continued medication. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory II and the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Prior psychotherapy was also superior to medication withdrawal in the prevention of recurrence across the 2nd year of follow-up. Specific comparisons indicated that patients previously exposed to CT were significantly less likely to relapse following treatment termination than patients withdrawn from medication, and patients previously exposed to behavioral activation did almost as well relative to patients withdrawn from medication, although the difference was not significantly different. Differences between behavioral activation and CT were small in magnitude and not significantly different across the full 2-year follow-up, and each therapy was at least as efficacious as the continuation of medication. These findings suggest that behavioral activation may be nearly as enduring as CT and that both psychotherapies are less expensive and longer lasting alternatives to medication in the treatment of depression.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years.

References

Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive Therapy of depression. New York: Guilford.

Clark, D. A., & Beck, A. T. (1999). Scientific foundations of Cognitive Theory and therapy of depression. New York: John Wiley.

Contact Information

Name: Michelle O'Connell, MGA
Title: Executive Director
Agency/Affiliation: Academy of Cognitive Therapy
Website: www.academyofct.org
Email:

Date Reviewed: March 2010