Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT)

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Substance Abuse Treatment (Adolescent).

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Substance-abusing runaway adolescents (12-17) and their family members who are willing to have the adolescents live in their homes.

EBFT addresses multiple ecological systems and originated from the therapeutic work with substance-abusing adolescents who have run away from home. The treatment was developed to address immediate needs, to resolve the crisis of running away, and to facilitate emotional re-connection through communication and problem solving skills among family members. Family interaction is a necessary target of the therapeutic techniques. Therapy relies on understanding the individual, interpersonal, and environmental context as well as the unique resources and needs of the family and its members. The intervention includes family systems techniques such as reframes, relabels, and relational interpretations; communication skills training; and conflict resolution, but also therapeutic case management in which systems outside the family are directly targeted. The model includes 12 home-based (or office-based) family therapy sessions and 2-4 individual HIV prevention sessions.

Essential Components

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) is based on the recognition that substance use and related individual and family problems derive from many sources of influence and occur in the context of intra-, inter- and extra-personal systems. The following assumptions are made:

  • The family is the primary system in a person’s life.
  • All family members contribute to the development, maintenance, and resolution of problems among its members.
  • Involvement of family members in the treatment of problems considered intrapersonal (e.g., substance use) will enhance positive individual, family, and social outcomes.
  • Because the family and its members are nested within the larger social system, dysfunction in the primary (family) setting will impact functioning in other settings.
  • Intervention does not focus solely on the individual, but on the social interactions among all participants that create the type of skill sets and emotional baseline for use in social interactions within and across systems.

EBFT is individually tailored to the needs of the family, as identified by assessing the family’s needs, strengths, and weaknesses.

Child Component

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Substance-abusing runaway behavior, sexual risk-taking, delinquency, and victim of abuse, trauma, or domestic violence.

Age range: 12 – 17

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Substance-abusing runaway adolescent dependent, family conflict, disengagement between family members, abuse and neglect, parental substance use and parental depression.

Group Format

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Adoptive Home
  • Birth Family Home
  • Foster Home
  • Outpatient Clinic

Homework

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) includes a homework component:

Homework is integrated to facilitate the application of skills, which are developed in the therapy context, to daily life. In most cases, homework is comprised of interpersonal tasks, rather than paper and pencil tasks. The tasks are creatively designed with the input of the family and should be specific enough to the issues family is facing. It is important to check in with family members at the session following assignment of homework to discuss how the task was carried out, reactions to it, successes, and failures.

Languages

Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) does not have materials available in a language other than English.

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Transportation to client home is needed if home-based therapy.
  • Therapy rooms are needed if office-based therapy and bus passes or tokens to help facilitate session attendance.
  • Audiotape recorders are needed for supervisory purposes for either type.
  • Therapists are usually provided cell phones so that clients can easily access the therapist in times of crisis.
  • In addition, the supervisor needs to have expertise in the social resources available in the social system to guide therapists in implementation of the case management component.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Level of education is less important than the ability to think relationally and systemically about the issues which families present. Therapists must be able to conceptualize the situation in terms of family relations which is central to the successful resolution of any presenting problem. In the research trials primarily Master's level counselors or family therapists were utilized.

In addition, the supervisors must be able to supervise systemic family therapy and have an understanding of the social systems, particularly juvenile justice, educational system, and health care, to guide therapists in case management. Supervisors must have outstanding skills to manage family crises and risks for the youth.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
Training is obtained:

Training is obtained onsite or offsite.

Number of days/hours:

The duration and intensity of training depend on the therapists' competence to think relationally and systemically as well as their ability to implement therapeutic skills required in the intervention. For family therapists, onsite training includes a 2-day didactic training followed by weekly role-play practice until comfort and ease with the systemic procedures has been achieved. Also, ongoing audiotape review is standard. Trainings should allow enough time for practice of skills and role-plays.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Slesnick, N., & Prestopnik, J. (2004). Office versus home-based family therapy for runaway, alcohol abusing adolescents: Examination of factors associated with treatment attendance. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 22(2), 3-19.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 77

Population:

  • Age range — None specified; mean age 15 years (SD = 1.36)
  • Race/Ethnicity — 36 Hispanic, 20 Anglo, 10 Native American, 5 African American, 6 Other
  • Gender — 31 males, 46 females
  • Status — Participants were recruited from two runaway shelters in a large southwestern city.

Location / Institution: Albuquerque, NM/University of New Mexico

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
This study examined predictors of treatment attendance for runaway, substance-abusing youth and their families. Participants were randomly assigned to either Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) or Functional Family Therapy (FFT). Measures included the Youth Self-Report of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), as well as the Form 90 interview, which was the primary measure of quantity-frequency of adolescent substance use, yielding the total percent days, in the last 90, of all alcohol and drug use. More families assigned to home-based EBFT were both engaged and attended more sessions compared to families assigned to the office-based FFT. 76% of the EBFT families participated in four or more sessions, while only 50% of the families assigned to FFT participated in four or more sessions. Adolescents with externalizing problems receiving EBFT had better attendance than those receiving FFT. However, severity of the adolescent’s alcohol and drug use did not significantly predict treatment attendance in either EBFT or FFT. Notable limitations of the study include its sole focus on shelter-residing runaway youth with primary alcohol problems, as well as the findings being based upon data collected solely from the adolescents’ perspectives.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Slesnick, N., & Prestopnik, J. (2005). Ecologically based family therapy outcome with substance abusing runaway adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 28(2), 277-298.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 124

Population:

  • Age range — 12-17 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 51 Hispanic, 46 Anglo, 9 African American, 5 Native American, 13 Other
  • Gender — 73 females, 51 males
  • Status — Participants were recruited from two local runaway shelters in Albuquerque, NM.

Location / Institution: University of New Mexico; Albuquerque

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were randomly assigned to either the Ecologically-Based Family Therapy (EBFT) condition or the service as usual (SAU) condition. The Form 90 was used to assess the quantity and frequency of drug and alcohol use. To further validate self-reported drug use, urine toxicology screens were collected for adolescents at pretreatment and the first post-treatment follow-up point (it was beyond the financial scope of the study to collect urine samples at each follow-up point). Among other measures, psychological functioning was assessed using the Youth Self-Report of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Overall, participants who received EBFT showed a greater reduction in overall substance use compared to those assigned to SAU. Among youth who reported physical and sexual abuse, those assigned to EBFT reported fewer problem consequences and reported a reduction in the number of different drugs used over time compared to those in SAU. Limitations of the study include the reliance on youth self-report of their family environment and their own behavior.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 6 and 12 month post-intervention follow-ups.

Slesnick, N., & Prestopnik, J. (2009). Comparison of family therapy outcome with alcohol-abusing, runaway adolescents. Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 35(3), 255-277.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 119

Population:

  • Age range — 12-17 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — (52) 44% Hispanic, (35) 29% Anglo, (13) 11% Native American, (6) 5% African American, (13) 11% Other
  • Gender — 45% male, 55% female
  • Status — Primary alcohol problem adolescents and their primary caretakers from two runaway shelters.

Location / Institution: Albuquerque, NM

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were assigned to either (a) home-based Ecologically Based Family Therapy (EBFT), (b) office-based Functional Family Therapy (FFT), or (c) service as usual (SAU) through the shelter. Measures included the Youth Self-Report of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), the computerized version of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (CDISC), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). The Form 90 was used to assess alcohol and drug patterns; urine toxicology screens were collected at pre- and post treatment assessment to verify self-reported illicit drug use. Findings showed that both EBFT and FFT significantly reduced alcohol and drug use compared with SAU at 15-month post baseline. Participants assigned to home-based EBFT showed a 97% decline in days of alcohol use (compared to an 83% decline for office-based FFT), and a 77% reduction in number of standard drinks consumed on drinking days (64% for FFT) at 15 months post-intake. Youth assigned to SAU showed a 59% reduction in days of alcohol use and virtually no change in number of standard drinks consumed on each drinking day. Adolescents in both family therapies (EBFT & FFT) reported a 72% reduction at 15 months follow-up, while SAU participants returned to baseline use levels. One limitation of the study is that it is difficult to conclude whether the findings are the result of the context of treatment (home vs. office) or of treatment condition (FFT vs. EBFT). Also the study is based on a sample of convenience, focused solely on runaway youth in the shelter system, and may not generalize to other youth.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 6-11 months after the end of treatment.

References

Slesnick, N. (2000). Treatment manual: Ecologically-Based Family Therapy for substance abusing runaway youth. Unpublished manuscript.

Slesnick, N. (2001). Variables associated with therapy attendance in runaway substance abusing youth: Preliminary findings. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(5), 411-420.

Contact Information

Name: Natasha Slesnick, PhD
Title: Professor
Agency/Affiliation: The Ohio State University
Department: Department of Human Development and Family Science
Website: ehe.osu.edu/hdfs/lab
Email:
Phone: (614) 247-8469
Fax: (614) 292-4365

Date Reviewed: April 2010