Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT)

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Substance Abuse Treatment (Adolescent).

FBT includes more than a dozen treatments including management of emergencies, treatment planning, behavioral goals, contingency management skills training, communication skills training, child management skills training, job-getting skills training, financial management, self-control, stimulus control, home safety tours, and tele-therapy to improve session attendance. Therapies are consumer-driven and culturally sensitive. FBT’s goal is to result in positive outcomes in such areas as alcohol and drug use, depression, conduct problems, family dysfunction, and days absent from work/school. FBT is designed to be used with youth, multiple ethnicities, differing types of substance abuse (alcohol, marijuana, and hard drugs), and across genders. Drafts of standardized client record keeping forms and quality assurance may be customized to fit agency needs.

Essential Components

Treatment Components

  • A structured Program Orientation that includes prompts to assist in gaining feedback from clients about the obtained assessment results, and providing opportunities to review issues that are common to the target population.
  • Assurance of Basic Necessities in which potential or impending emergencies are endorsed by clients from a list, and a self-control procedure is taught to keep the family safe.
  • A list of commonly experienced triggers to problem behaviors that when endorsed by clients may be quickly switched into pre-established Behavioral Goals that are anchored to rewards that are provided by family members.
  • Treatment Planning options that are anchored to specific FBT components and prioritized by the client and family.
  • Communication Skills Training exercises in which clients and their families share what they love, admire, and respect about one another, learn to make positive requests, and develop conflict resolutions skills.
  • Child Management Skills Training in which parents learn to discipline their children by catching them being good, positive practice learning exercises, and when necessary, provision of firm directives and undesired consequences.
  • Job-getting Skills Training to teach clients and family how to solicit and do well in job interviews.
  • A Financial Management intervention in which clients and their family learn to use a standardized worksheet with common methods of earning and saving extra income and reducing expenses.
  • A Self-Control intervention in which clients and their family learn to identify and manage triggers to problem behaviors, such as child neglect, HIV risk, drug abuse, and anger in imaginary trials.
  • A Stimulus Control intervention in which clients and their family learn to restructure their environment to eliminate or manage negative emotions and things in the environment that cause them to engage in troublesome behaviors, such as substance abuse, child maltreatment, arguments, etc.
  • Tele-therapy with clients and their significant others to assure therapy assignments and treatments are being reviewed as prescribed, and increase therapy session attendance.

Contextual Programming

  • Structured Pre-Training Questionnaires to be completed by therapists and administrators of the treatment agency to customize the FBT training experience to fit the unique needs of the agency’s culture.
  • Published and Non-Published Training Manuals include brief overviews and rationales of each of the intervention approaches, client worksheets and homework assignment forms, and methods of implementing the therapy components.
  • Protocol Checklists depict how to implement the FBT treatment components, and include step-by-step instructions for therapists to utilize during their intervention sessions.
  • Training/Supervision Protocol Checklist depicts steps involved in maintaining on-going training and supervision protocol that are consistent with FBT.
  • Forms Relevant to Client Record Keeping include standardized progress notes, treatment plans, log of contacts, monthly client progress reports to outside parties (i.e., caseworker, judges), termination reports, etc. that correspond to FBT components.
  • Quality Assurance Monitoring forms to assure adequacy of client charting and clinic procedures.
  • Data Management System that may be used to organize program related outcome data that is relevant to FBT.

FBT has a family component where siblings/children are treated at the same time as the substance abuser.

Child Component

Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Alcohol and drug misuse, depression, school/work attendance problems, problem solving skills, conduct problems, and problems in the family relationship.

Age range: 11 – 17

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Youth in their care with alcohol and drug misuse, depression, school/work attendance problems, problem solving skills, conduct problems, and problems in the family relationship.

Group Format

Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Setting

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Outpatient Clinic

Homework

Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) includes a homework component:

All treatment components have a therapy assignment, with most including easy-to-complete forms with fill-in-the-blank spaces, check boxes, and pictures (to assist family members who have problems reading and make the forms more exciting). Practice assignments are reviewed each session to assist clients and their families in generalizing and expediting skill acquisition. Incomplete assignments are reviewed in retrospect during session to encourage future completion.

Languages

Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) has materials available in a language other than English:

Spanish

For information on which materials are available in this language, please check on the program's website or contact the program representative (contact information is listed at the bottom of this page).

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Protocol checklists to guide therapy implementation
  • A private place in which to conduct therapy
  • Donohue, B., & Azrin, N. H. (2011). Family Behavior Therapy: A step-by-step approach to adolescent substance abuse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Supervisors must be state-licensed mental health professionals with an interest in supervising the intervention. They should ideally have experience in conducting evidence-based therapies, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapies, and must have professional therapeutic experience serving the population that is being targeted for treatment.

Therapists should be state-licensed mental health professionals. They should ideally have experience serving the population that is being targeted for treatment, and must have an interest in conducting therapy utilizing the intervention.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
Training is obtained:

Training usually occurs in the treatment agency, although other arrangements can be made based on agency needs and trainer availability. The website below includes links to more information about the program, including examples of free access to films of program implementation in simulated therapy sessions, empirical studies of the program, measures that have been used to examine the program, and potential trainers.

Number of days/hours:

There are a number of persons who have received extensive training in the program, and have expressed an interest in training others for a negotiated fee. Dr. Donohue may be contacted to assist in determining potential trainers (see below). Dr. Donohue receives no financial compensation from these trainers, and will not accept financial compensation from community-based agencies for assistance he may provide relevant to the program. Although the training format may vary somewhat depending on who conducts the training, trainers utilize conference calls and questionnaires to assist trainers in learning about agency needs.

There are 4 training options available: 1) a 1-day Relationship Enhancement/Communication Skills Training workshop; 2) a 2-day Drug Use Counseling workshop; 3) a ¾ - day Job Finding/Financial Management workshop; and 4) a 3-day comprehensive workshop that includes each of the aforementioned intervention approaches.

After the respective workshop series, there are typically on-going telephone-assisted training sessions aimed at enhancing treatment implementation (integrity). These telephone calls usually last 60 to 90 minutes per week initially, and fade in their frequency thereafter. A 6-month booster workshop of 1or 2 days during the first year is highly recommended, and annual booster workshops are recommended in future years whenever possible.

Implementation Information

Since Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

To be given to organizations or providers in order to measure organizational or individual readiness:

Structured Pre-Training Questionnaires are available to be completed by therapists and administrators of the treatment agency to customize the FBT training experience to fit the unique needs of the agency's culture. For more information, please contact Brad Donohue at Bradley.Donohue@gmail.com.

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

  • There are several treatment manuals currently available to assist in understanding the theoretical, practical, and empirical aspects of FBT. Training Manuals include brief overviews and rationales of each of the intervention approaches, examples of client worksheets and homework assignment forms, and methods of implementing the therapy components:
    • Donohue, B., Allen, D. A., & Lapota, H. (2009). Family Behavior Therapy. In D. Springer & A. Rubin (Eds.), Substance abuse treatment for youth and adults (pp. 205-255). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    • Allen, D.N., Donohue, B., Sutton, G., Haderlie, M., & LaPota, H. (2009). Family Behavior Therapy for substance abuse and other associated problems: A review of its standardized assessment methods and their applicability. Behavior Modification, 33, 618-654.
    • Donohue, B., Azrin, N., Allen, D. N., Romero, V., Hill, H. H., Tracy, K., …Van Hasselt, V. B. (in press). Family Behavior Therapy for substance abuse: A review of its intervention components and applicability. Behavior Modification.
  • Protocol Checklists depict how to implement the FBT treatment components, and include step-by-step instructions for therapists to utilize during their intervention sessions. In particular, the Training/Supervision Protocol Checklist depicts the steps involved in maintaining on-going training and supervision protocol that are consistent with FBT.
  • Forms relevant to client record keeping include standardized progress notes, treatment plans, log of contacts, monthly client progress reports to outside parties (i.e., caseworker, judges), and termination reports, among others, that correspond to FBT components.
  • Quality assurance monitoring forms are used to assure adequacy of client charting and clinic procedures.
  • A data management system may be used to organize program related outcome data that is relevant to FBT.

For quesitons on Implementation Tools information, please contact Brad Donohue at Bradley.Donohue@gmail.com.

Fidelity Measures

Measures are available to determine fidelity in therapy sessions, training sessions, supervision, and clinic record keeping. For more information, please contact Brad Donohue at Bradley.Donohue@gmail.com.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Azrin, N. H., McMahon, P., Donohue, B., Besalel, V., Lapinski, K., Kogan, E., Galloway, E. (1994). Behavior therapy of drug abuse: A controlled outcome study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 857-866.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 82 (68 Adults, 14 Youth)

Population:

  • Age range — Mean 27.5 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 9% minority persons (Afro-American, Hispanic, Native American)
  • Gender — 68% males, 32% females
  • Status — Participants were recruited from agencies and through newspaper advertisements and were eligible if they had used illegal drugs at least once during the past month & during the initial 1-month assessment period, and were NOT currently under psychological treatment.

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were randomly assigned to either the behavioral (Family Behavior Therapy) or non-behavioral program conditions. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which assesses depression, as well as the Parent-Youth Happiness Scale, which was one of the measures used to assess family relationships. Urine samples were obtained each session, and one sample each month during treatment underwent urinalysis. Illegal drug use was reduced to a greater extent by the behavioral program than the non-behavioral; the differential decrease occurred for males, females, youth, adults, high-school graduates, high-school dropouts, hard drug users, crack-cocaine users, marijuana users, married adults, unmarried adults, self-referred subjects, and agency-referred subjects. In the non-behavioral treatment, the proportion of subjects using drugs decreased during the first month to 80% of the subjects and remained at that general level for the remaining 11 months. In the behavioral treatment, the proportion of subjects using drugs decreased progressively. During the 2nd month of treatment, about 63% of subjects were using drugs; by the 4th month, 50% were using drugs, and by the 12th month, about 35% were using drugs compared to 74 to 86% of the subjects using drugs during each of the 12 months for the non-behavioral program. The differential reduction was greatest for youth, who were typically treated with their parent(s), who participated actively in the behavioral program. The youth in behavioral therapy averaged 8.9 months of abstinence during the 12 months of the study compared to only less than one month (0.6) of abstinence for the youth in the non-behavioral therapy. Notable limitations of this study include the small sample size, the fact that the sample included a majority of adults, rather than youth, and the self-report nature of drug use assessment.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Azrin, N. H., Donohue, B., Besalel, V., Kogan, E., & Acierno, R. (1994). Youth drug abuse treatment: A controlled outcome study. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 3, 1-16.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 26

Population:

  • Age range — 13-18 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 5 Minority Persons (denoted as African-American or Hispanic)
  • Gender — 20 male, 6 female
  • Status — Participants were recruited from agencies, schools, and newspaper advertisements. Fourteen of the 26 subjects had been in the Azrin, McMahon, et al., 1994 study, of which the present study is an extension.

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The purpose of this study was to extend a prior study that involved both adults and youth (14 youth, or 17% of the sample size), by increasing the number of youth participants. As in the previous study, subjects were randomly assigned to either the behavioral (Family Behavior Therapy) or supportive treatment program. In the supportive program, parents attended sessions once a month, while parents attended each session in the behavioral intervention. Measures included Parent and Youth Satisfaction Scales, which assess the youth-parent relationship, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to assess youth depression, and the Quay Problem Behavior Checklist, which assesses overall adjustment of the youth. A urine sample was obtained each session for urinalysis; during the 6-month treatment period, this analysis was performed once per month. Results showed that illegal drug use was reduced by the behavioral program to a relatively greater extent than by the supportive program: a 73% reduction in the number of youths using drugs at the end of treatment. Alcohol use was significantly reduced in subjects receiving behavioral therapy, but increased in subjects receiving supportive counseling. The behavioral program also produced significantly greater improvements, relative to the supportive program, in several areas related to drug use, including decreased depression levels, improved school/employment attendance, and improved family relationships. Limitations of the study include a small sample size and the use of self-report in assessing drug use.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Azrin, N., Acierno, R., Kogan, E. S., Donohue, B., Besalel, V., & McMahon, P. T. (1996). Follow-up results of Supportive versus Behavioral Therapy for illicit drug use. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 41-46.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 74

Population:

  • Age range — 13-43 years; Youth: 13-18 years (57 adults, 17 youth)
  • Race/Ethnicity — 9 minority persons
  • Gender — 55 males, 19 females
  • Status — Participants came from pool of subjects who had initiated treatment within the previous two years; 64 of the 74 subjects provided end-of-treatment data in the Azrin, Donohue, et al., 1994 and Azrin, McMahon et al., 1994 studies (see above research summaries)

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova-Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were assigned randomly to either a supportive-discussion counseling program or to a directive behavioral program (Family Behavior Therapy). Drug use was measured using urinalyses, self-report, and report of significant others. Follow-up data were obtained for subjects who had been treated for a mean of 8 months and 17 sessions in a controlled comparison of behavioral vs. supportive-discussion counseling for drug abuse. At the follow-up month, drugs were used at least once by 71% of adolescents in the supportive-discussion counseling condition compared to 42% of those in the behavioral condition. In terms of the number of days of use per month, supportive-discussion counseling subjects did not decrease drug use either by the end of treatment or at follow-up. For behavioral program subjects, on the other hand, drug use decreased by 63% by the end of treatment and by 73% at follow-up. Limitations of the study include the mixed sample of both adults and youth, the fact that 25 subjects dropped out before follow-up data could be obtained, the high variability of follow-up lengths, and the self-report component of drug use measures.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: Length of follow-up varied by subject. At a minimum, the follow-up was 6 months post-intervention, with the mean follow-up occurring 9 months after the end of treatment.

Azrin, N. H., Donohue, B., Teichner, G., Crum, T., Howell, J., & DeCato, L. (2001). A controlled evaluation and description of individual-cognitive problem solving and family behavioral therapies in conduct-disordered and substance dependent youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Substance Abuse, 11, 1-43.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 56

Population:

  • Age range — 12-17 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 44 Caucasian, 9 Hispanic, 1 African-American, 2 Other
  • Gender — 46 Male, 10 Female
  • Status — Participants were referred to the study by juvenile detention center staff, judges, probation officers, and school administrators.

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova-Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were randomly assigned to receive either individual cognitive problem-solving therapy (ICPS) or family-behavioral therapy (Family Behavior Therapy). Measures of drug use included the Timeline Followback (TLFB) interview, which assesses the frequency of illicit drug and alcohol use, and urine samples obtained during each assessment and treatment session. Conduct, family satisfaction, and problem-solving skills were among other areas that assessments - such as the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), and Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) - were used to measure. Subjects in both intervention groups showed significant improvements in their conduct and reductions in their use of illicit drugs from pre-treatment to post-treatment, and these results were maintained at 6-month follow-up. However, initiation of the family intervention led to a slight reduction in hard drug use during treatment and follow-up months, whereas initiation of the ICPS resulted in an insignificant reduction in hard drug use during treatment, and an increase in hard drug use during the follow-up months. Notable limitations of the study include the small sample size and lack of a “no-treatment” control condition.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 6 months.

References

Donohue, B., Allen, D. A., & Lapota, H. (2009). Family Behavior Therapy. In D. Springer & A. Rubin (Eds.), Substance abuse treatment for youth and adults (pp. 205-255). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Donohue, B., & Azrin, N. H. (2001). Family Behavior Therapy. In E. Wagner & H. Waldron (Eds.), Innovations in adolescent substance abuse intervention (pp. 205-227). Tarrytown, NY: Pergamon Press.

Donohue, B., & Azrin, N. H. (2011). Family Behavior Therapy: A step-by-step approach to adolescent substance abuse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Contact Information

Name: Brad Donohue, PhD
Agency/Affiliation: University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Website: web.unlv.edu/labs/frs/index.html
Email:
Phone: (702) 557-5111

Date Reviewed: April 2010