Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT)

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Substance Abuse Treatment (Adult).

FBT for Adults includes more than a dozen treatments including management of emergencies, treatment planning, behavioral goals, contingency management skills training, communication skills training, child management skills training, job-getting skills training, financial management, self-control, stimulus control, home safety tours, and tele-therapy to improve session attendance. Therapies are consumer-driven and culturally sensitive. FBT for Adults’ goal is to result in positive outcomes in such areas as alcohol and drug use, depression, conduct problems, family dysfunction, and days absent from work/school. FBT for Adults is designed to be used with adults, multiple ethnicities, differing types of substance abuse (alcohol, marijuana, and hard drugs), and across genders. Drafts of standardized client record keeping forms and quality assurance may be customized to fit agency needs. Family Behavior Therapy for Adolescents (FBT) has also been rated on this website, please click on the program name to be sent to its separate page.

Essential Components

Treatment Components:

  • A structured Program Orientation that includes prompts to assist in gaining feedback from clients about the obtained assessment results, and provides opportunities to review issues that are common to the target population.
  • Assurance of Basic Necessities in which potential or impending emergencies are endorsed by clients from a list, and a self-control procedure is taught to keep the family safe.
  • A list of commonly experienced triggers to problem behaviors that, when endorsed by clients, may be quickly switched into pre-established Behavioral Goals that are anchored to rewards that are provided by family members.
  • Treatment Planning options that are anchored to specific FBT for Adults components and prioritized by the client and family.
  • Communication Skills Training exercises in which clients and their families share what they love, admire, and respect about one another, learn to make positive requests, and develop conflict resolutions skills.
  • Child Management Skills Training in which parents learn to discipline their children by catching them being good, positive practice learning exercises, and, when necessary, provision of firm directives and undesired consequences.
  • Job-getting Skills Training to teach clients and family how to solicit and do well in job interviews.
  • A Financial Management intervention in which clients and their family learn to use a standardized worksheet with common methods of earning and saving extra income and reducing expenses.
  • A Self-Control intervention in which clients and their family learn to identify and manage triggers to problem behaviors, such as child neglect, HIV risk, drug abuse, and anger in imaginary trials.
  • A Stimulus Control intervention in which clients and their family learn to restructure their environment to eliminate or manage negative emotions and things in the environment that cause them to engage in troublesome behaviors, such as substance abuse, child maltreatment, arguments, etc.
  • Tele-therapy with clients and their significant others to assure therapy assignments and treatments are being reviewed as prescribed, and increase therapy session attendance.

Contextual Programming:

  • Structured Pre-Training Questionnaires to be completed by therapists and administrators of the treatment agency to customize the FBT for Adults training experience to fit the unique needs of the agency’s culture.
  • Published and Non-Published Training Manuals include brief overviews and rationales of each of the intervention approaches, client worksheets and homework assignment forms, and methods of implementing the therapy components.
  • Protocol Checklists depict how to implement the FBT for Adults treatment components, and include step-by-step instructions for therapists to utilize during their intervention sessions.
  • Training/Supervision Protocol Checklist depicts steps involved in maintaining on-going training and supervision protocol that are consistent with FBT for Adults.
  • Forms Relevant to Client Record Keeping include standardized progress notes, treatment plans, log of contacts, monthly client progress reports to outside parties (e.g., caseworker, judges), termination reports, etc. that correspond to FBT for Adults components.
  • Quality Assurance Monitoring forms to assure adequacy of client charting and clinic procedures.
  • Data Management System that may be used to organize program related outcome data that is relevant to FBT for Adults.

Child Component

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) was not designed with a child component.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Alcohol and drug misuse, depression, school/work attendance problems, parenting stress, poor child management and communication skills, family dysfunction, HIV prevention, child abuse and neglect, home hazards, management of emergencies, and conduct problems in children.
Treatment Involves Family/Support Structures:

This program involves the family or other support systems in the individual's treatment: FBT for Adults has treatment components directly related to raising children such as communication skills training and child management skills training in which parents learn to discipline their children by catching them being good, positive practice learning exercises, and, when necessary, provision of firm directives and undesired consequences.

Adult Component

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) was designed with an adult component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Alcohol and drug misuse, depression, work attendance problems, poor communication skills, and management of emergencies.

Group Format

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Birth Family Home
  • Community Agency
  • Foster Home
  • Outpatient Clinic
  • Residential Care Facility

Homework

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) includes a homework component:

All treatment components have a therapy assignment, with most including easy-to-complete forms with fill-in-the-blank spaces, check boxes, and pictures (to assist family members who have problems reading and make the forms more exciting). Practice assignments are reviewed each session to assist clients and their families in generalizing and expediting skill acquisition. Incomplete assignments are reviewed in retrospect during session to encourage future completion.

Languages

Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) has materials available in a language other than English:

Spanish

For information on which materials are available in this language, please check on the program's website or contact the program representative (contact information is listed at the bottom of this page).

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Protocol checklists to guide therapy implementation
  • A private place in which to conduct therapy
  • Donohue, B., & Allen, D. A. (2011). Family Behavior Therapy: A step-by-step approach to adult substance abuse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Supervisors must be state-licensed mental health professionals with an interest in supervising the intervention. They should ideally have experience in conducting evidence-based therapies, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapies, and should have professional therapeutic experience serving the population that is being targeted for treatment.

Therapists should be state-licensed mental health professionals. They should ideally have experience serving the population that is being targeted for treatment, and must have an interest in conducting therapy utilizing the intervention.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
Training is obtained:

Training may occur at the treatment agency. Other training sites are currently available in Pennsylvania, Nevada, California and Kentucky.

Number of days/hours:

The process begins with conference calls and questionnaires to learn about the unique needs of the agency wishing to be trained. Several training options are available. The full FBT training package includes 3 modules:

  1. Substance Abuse/Problem Behavior interventions
  2. Family Relationship Building interventions
  3. Job-Getting and Financial Management

The full package is conducted across a 4-day workshop, a 2-day booster workshop, and 33 on-going telephone training sessions. When less intensive training is desired, the modules can be separated. The Substance Abuse/Problem Behavior module requires a 2-day workshop w/ 19 on-going telephone training sessions; the Family Relationship Building module, as well as the Job-Getting and Financial Management modules each require a 1-day workshop with 7 on-going telephone training sessions.

Additional Resources:

There currently are additional qualified resources for training:

Several agencies have received training, and have indicated availability to assist in training. A current list of these agencies is available from Dr. Brad Donohue (see above contact information). Dr. Donohue has agreed to provide cost-free assistance in the identification of training services from agencies for which he receives no financial compensation as well as other publicly available resources relevant to the program.

Implementation Information

Since Family Behavior Therapy for Adults (FBT) is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

To be given to organizations or providers in order to measure organizational or individual readiness:

FBT training staff may request administrators and mental health providers to answer a questionnaire that is relevant to their readiness and interests relevant to the implementation of FBT. These questionnaires may be obtained from the agencies directly. Dr. Donohue has agreed to facilitate acquisition of these questionnaires, whenever desired.

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

A comprehensive treatment manual relevant to FBT in Adults (Donohue, B. & Allen, D. H. (2011). Family behavior therapy in adults: A step by step approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons) is expected to be available in February of 2011. Dr. Brad Donohue has agreed to assist in obtaining freely available materials to assist in the implementation of FBT, including videotapes demonstrating FBT implementation.

Fidelity Measures

Fidelity Measures, including instructions in their use, are available in the following treatment manual: Donohue, B. & Allen, D. H. (2011). Family behavior therapy in adults: A step by step approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons which is expected to be available in February of 2011.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Azrin, N. H., McMahon, P., Donohue, B., Besalel, V., Lapinski, K., Kogan, E., Galloway, E. (1994). Behavior therapy of drug abuse: A controlled outcome study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 857-866.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 82 (68 Adults, 14 Youth)

Population:

  • Age range — Mean 27.5 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 9% minority persons (Afro-American, Hispanic, Native American)
  • Gender — 68% males, 32% females
  • Status — Participants were recruited from agencies and through newspaper advertisements and were eligible if they had used illegal drugs at least once during the past month & during the initial 1-month assessment period, and were NOT currently under psychological treatment.

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were randomly assigned to either the behavioral (Family Behavior Therapy for Adults) or non-behavioral program conditions. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), which assesses depression, as well as the Parent and Youth Happiness Scales, which are measures used to assess family relationships. Urine samples were obtained each session, and one sample each month during treatment underwent urinalysis. Illegal drug use was reduced to a greater extent by the behavioral program than the non-behavioral; the differential decrease occurred for males, females, youth, adults, high-school graduates, high-school dropouts, hard drug users, crack-cocaine users, marijuana users, married adults, unmarried adults, self-referred subjects, and agency-referred subjects. In the non-behavioral treatment, the proportion of subjects using drugs decreased during the first month to 80% of the subjects and remained at that general level for the remaining 11 months. In the behavioral treatment, the proportion of subjects using drugs decreased progressively. During the 2nd month of treatment, about 63% of subjects were using drugs; by the 4th month, 50% were using drugs, and by the 12th month, about 35% were using drugs compared to 74 to 86% of the subjects using drugs during each of the 12 months for the non-behavioral program. The behavioral intervention was also more effective than the control condition in parent satisfaction with youth, days using alcohol, days employed/attending school, and days institutionalized. Groups were not different in their improvement in the number of police contacts and marital happiness.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Azrin, N., Acierno, R., Kogan, E. S., Donohue, B., Besalel, V., & McMahon, P. T. (1996). Follow-up results of supportive versus behavioral therapy for illicit drug use. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 41-46.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 74

Population:

  • Age range — 13-43 years (57 adults, 17 youth)
  • Race/Ethnicity — 9 minority persons
  • Gender — 55 males, 19 females
  • Status — Participants came from pool of subjects who had initiated treatment within the previous two years; 64 of the 74 subjects provided end-of-treatment data in the Azrin, McMahon, et al., 1994 study above.

Location / Institution: Ft. Lauderdale, FL/Nova-Southeastern University

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Participants were assigned randomly to either a supportive-discussion counseling program or to a directive behavioral program (Family Behavior Therapy for Adults). Drug use was measured using urinalyses, self-report, and report of significant others. Follow-up data were obtained for subjects who had been treated for a mean of 8 months and 17 sessions in a controlled comparison of behavioral vs. supportive-discussion counseling for drug abuse. At the follow-up month, drugs were used at least once by 71% of subjects in the supportive-discussion counseling condition compared to 42% of those in the behavioral condition. In terms of the number of days of use per month, supportive-discussion counseling subjects did not decrease drug use either by the end of treatment or at follow-up. For behavioral program subjects, on the other hand, drug use decreased by 63% by the end of treatment and by 73% at follow-up. Alcohol use and days worked/in school showed an analogous pattern for greater improvement for Behavioral subjects being maintained at follow-up. Limitations of the study include the high variability of follow-up lengths and that 25 subjects dropped out before follow-up data could be obtained.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: Length of follow-up varied by subject. At a minimum, the follow-up was 6 months post-intervention, with the mean follow-up occurring 9 months after the end of treatment.

References

Allen, D. N., Donohue, B., Sutton, G., Haderlie, M., & LaPota, H. (2009). Family Behavior Therapy for substance abuse and other associated problems: A review of its standardized assessment methods and their applicability. Behavior Modification, 33, 618-654.

Donohue, B., Allen, D. A., & Lapota, H. (2009). Family Behavior Therapy. In D. Springer & A. Rubin (Eds.), Substance abuse treatment for youth and adults (pp. 205-255). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Donohue, B., & Azrin, N. H. (2011). Family Behavior Therapy: A step-by-step approach to adult substance abuse. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Contact Information

Name: Brad Donohue, PhD
Agency/Affiliation: University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Website: web.unlv.edu/labs/frs/index.html
Email:
Phone: (702) 557-5111

Date Reviewed: November 2010