Home  «  Program  «  Nurse Family Partnership  « 

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP)

Scientific Rating:
1
Well-Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program has been rated by the CEBC in the areas of: Home Visiting for Child Well-Being and Home Visiting for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect.

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: First-time, low-income mothers (no previous live births).

The Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) program provides home visits by registered nurses to first-time, low-income mothers, beginning during pregnancy and continuing through the child’s second birthday. The program has three primary goals: (1) to improve pregnancy outcomes by promoting health-related behaviors; (2) to improve child health, development and safety by promoting competent care-giving; and (3) to enhance parent life-course development by promoting pregnancy planning, educational achievement, and employment. The program also has two secondary goals: to enhance families’ material support by providing links with needed health and social services, and to promote supportive relationships among family and friends.

Essential Components

Clients

  • Voluntary
  • First time mothers
  • Low income
  • Enrolled early in pregnancy

Intervention context

  • Within a 1:1 therapeutic relationship
  • Visits are in the clients home
  • Visit schedule per guidelines and client’s needs

Nurses and Supervisors

  • Complete all NFP core education

Application of the intervention

  • Nurses use their judgment to apply the NFP visit guidelines across 6 domains:
    • Personal Health
    • Environmental Health
    • Life Course Development
    • Maternal Role
    • Family and Friends
    • Health and Human Services
  • Nurses apply the three theories through current strategies:
    • Self-Efficacy
    • Human Ecology
    • Attachment
  • Nurses carry manageable caseloads, no more than 25 families

Reflection and Clinical Supervision

  • 1:1 weekly clinical supervision for each nurse with the nurse supervisor
  • Case conferences are structure, at least 2 times a month
  • Nurse supervisors conduct joint home visits with each nurse three times a year

Program Monitoring and Use of Data

  • Nurses collect data as specified by the Nurse-Family Partnership National Service Office (NFP NSO), and all data is sent to the NFP NSO’s national database called the Clinical Information System (CIS)
  • NFP NSO reports data to agencies to assess and guide program implementation
  • Agencies use these reports to monitor, identify and improve variances, and assure fidelity to the NFP model

Agency

  • Is networked with other services in the community
  • Has community support for sustainability

Child Component

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • First child of a mother with a low socio-economic status.

Age range: 0 – 5

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Pregnant with first child, low socio-economic level.

Group Format

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Birth Family Home
  • Community Agency

Homework

This program does not include a homework component.

Languages

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) has materials available in a language other than English:

Spanish

For information on which materials are available in this language, please check on the program's website or contact the program representative (contact information is listed at the bottom of this page).

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Office space that facilitates confidentiality related to clients and health care records
  • Computer and telecommunication capabilities
  • Cell phones
  • 1 FTE Nurse Supervisor per 4 FTE nurse home visitors
  • 0.50 FTE clerical/data entry support for each 4-nurse team serving 100 families
  • Adequate travel expense reimbursement (mileage) for home visitors

In addition, a community advisory board and strong, stable, and sustainable funding for agency operations is recommended.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Nurse home visitors:
Registered Nurse with a Bachelor's Degree in nursing, as a minimum qualification.

Nurse Supervisor:
Registered Nurse with a Bachelor's Degree in nursing, as a minimum qualification, and a Master's Degree in Nursing preferred.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
Training is obtained:

Orientation self-study plus training provided in Denver, which also includes distance-learning strategies.

Number of days/hours:

For Nurse Home Visitors AND Supervisors:

  • Unit One: 40 hours of orientation self-study
  • Unit Two: 25 hours over 3 ¾ days in Denver of face-to-face education and experiential practice
  • Unit Three: approximately 10 hours of additional distance education and a series of team-based, supervisor-led topical professional development modules

For Supervisors (in addition to the above):

  • Supervisor Unit One: 10 hours of additional self-study
  • Supervisor Unit Two: 1 additional day of Supervisor
  • Orientation during Unit Two education week in Denver
  • Supervisor Unit Three: 20 additional hours over 3 days, face-to-face in Denver
  • Ongoing consultation with a Nurse-Family Partnership Nurse Consultant
  • Annual Supervisor Education and Refresher: 20 hours over 3 days, face-to-face in Denver annually

Implementation Information

Since Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

To be given to organizations or providers in order to measure organizational or individual readiness:

The NFP Overview and Initial Planning Q & A: Is NFP Right for You? tool provides a detailed overview of the NFP National Service Office and its components, as well as detailed information that each interested prospective agency should consider before committing to implement the NFP program. This is a step-by-step guide through the most frequently asked questions about the model and its implementation. This tool is not available online, but can be obtained by contacting the NFP Program Developer in your state/region. Please contact the Program Development Team at 866-864-5226 or info@nursefamilypartnership.org to request a copy.

Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) has a structured system for agencies that are interested in implementing NFP.

  • NFP Program Developers are located across the county in order to provide regional, on-the-ground support for those interested in implementing the program. There are dedicated program developers assigned to the states of California and Texas. The map of current NFP implementing agencies and contact information for the Program Developers is available at: www.nursefamilypartnership.org/Locations. Just click on your state (or a state near yours) and a county in it to get the regional program developer.
  • Program Developers meet with interested stakeholders at various levels in local communities, county government, and state government to educate them about NFP, the factors needed to implement the model successfully and with fidelity, and how to find proper funding.
  • The NFP Implementation Application process requires that an interested agency complete a formal written application with accompanying documentation. A review team from the headquarters, NFP National Service Office ( NFP NSO), assesses the agency's readiness to implement the program based on the submitted application. If further information or detail is needed to determine approval, the interested agency will continue to work with the program developer and resubmit. Applications are not available on-line, but can be obtained directly from the regional NFP Program Developer.
  • Once an agency is approved, an NFP Nurse Consultant from the national office provides:
    • Support for the agency in hiring nurses and supervisors.
    • Required NFP Education for agency staff that includes both distance on on-site in Denver education over the course of several months.

If you are interested in obtaining additional information, contact the NFP Program Development Team at 866-864-5226 or via email at info@nursefamilypartnership.org.

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

  • The Implementation Application and accompanying guidance documents help an interested agency understand the specifics needed to be successful implementing the NFP program. It provides thorough guidance to complete a comprehensive application for submission to the review team at the NFP NSO. The Application and Guidance are not available online, but can be obtained by contacting the NFP Program Developer in your state/region. The map of current NFP implementing agencies and contact information for the Program Developers is available at: www.nursefamilypartnership.org/Locations. Just click on your state (or a state near yours) and a county in it to get the regional program developer.
  • The sample budget and budget narrative provide a template to estimate local cost to implement the program. This tool is not available online, but can be obtained by contacting the NFP Program Developer in your state/region. The map of current NFP implementing agencies and contact information for the Program Developers is available at: www.nursefamilypartnership.org/Locations. Just click on your state (or a state near yours) and a county in it to get the regional program developer.
  • There is a required orientation education process for both NFP nurse home visitors and NFP supervisors that includes training to use the NFP Visit-to-Visit Guidelines with nursing judgment in applying them to each family served. These resources are provided to every nursing team employed by a local implementing agency that is under contract with the NFP NSO to implement the program.
  • The Supervisor Handbook covers subjects the nurse supervisor will need to know in implementing the NFP model.

Fidelity Measures

  • Before becoming a NFP Implementing Agency, there must be assurance by the applying agency of its intention to deliver the program with fidelity to the model tested. Such fidelity requires adherence to all of the Nurse-Family Partnership Model Elements. The elements can be found at www.nursefamilypartnership.org/communities/model-elements.
  • Nurses collect client and home visit data as specified by the NFP NSO, and all data is sent to the NFP NSO's national database. The NFP NSO reports out data to agencies to assess and guide program implementation, and agencies use these reports to monitor, identify and improve variances, and assure fidelity to the NFP model.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "1 - Well-Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least two rigorous randomized controlled trials with one showing a sustained effect of at least 1 year. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcomes: Safety and Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

When more than 10 research articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals, the CEBC selects 10 for inclusion, with a preference for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled studies. The 10 articles chosen for Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) are listed below:

Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Chamberlin, R., &, Tatelbaum, R. (1985). Preventing Child Abuse and Neglect: A randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics, 78, 65-78.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 400 mothers

Population:

  • Age range — 47% younger than 19
  • Race/Ethnicity — 89% Caucasian. Non-Caucasian sample reported in separate paper.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Determined at intake to have at least one risk factor: mother < 19, single parent status, or low socioeconomic status.

Location / Institution: Elmira, New York

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Volunteers and women recruited due to a risk factor were randomly assigned to one of 4 conditions: Nurse home visitation during the first two years of life, nurse home visitation during pregnancy only, free transportation to regular prenatal and perinatal visits, and sensory and developmental screening at 12 and 24 months only. Nurse home visits included education on parenting, involving friends and family, enhancing social support, and linking families to other health and human services. Measures included medical examinations and developmental testing using the Bayley and Cattell Scales at 6, 12, and 24 months, and home observation using the Caldwell and Bradley Procedure. The list of participants was also checked against verified cases of abuse and neglect and medical records were examined. Among women at highest risk, those visited by a nurse had fewer reports of child abuse and neglect, were observed to restrict and punish children less frequently, provided more appropriate play materials and had fewer emergency room visits. In the second year, all nurse-visited women, regardless of risk status, had fewer emergency room visits and fewer physician visits for accidents and poisoning.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years after birth of child.

Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., & Kitzman, H. (1994). Does prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation have enduring effects on qualities of parental caregiving and child health at 25 to 50 months of life? Pediatrics, 93, 89-98.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 316 to 340, depending on assessment period

Population:

  • Age range — 47% of mothers less than 19 years of age
  • Race/Ethnicity — 89% Caucasian. Non-Caucasian sample reported in separate paper.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Determined at intake to have at least one risk factor: mother < 19, single parent status, or low socioeconomic status.

Location / Institution: Elmira, New York

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study used the same sample as Olds, et al., 1985. Volunteers and women recruited due to a risk factor were randomly assigned to one of 4 conditions: Nurse home visitation during the first two years of life, nurse home visitation during pregnancy only, free transportation to regular prenatal and perinatal visits, and sensory and developmental screening at 12 and 24 months only. Home assessments were made using the Caldwell and Bradley Home Inventory. Interviewers also compiled a checklist evaluating children’s exposure to hazardous substances and situations in the home. The Stanford Binet test of intelligence was administered at 36 and 48 months. Finally, pediatric and hospital records were reviewed for the 25th through the 50th month and Child Protective Service records were checked against the list of participants. No treatment differences were found for child abuse, neglect, or in intellectual functioning. Children in the nurse-visited condition had fewer hazards in the home, fewer injuries and ingestions, and fewer behavioral and parental coping problems noted on medical records. Nurse visited mothers showed higher levels of punishment and restriction, but the authors suggest that their analysis shows this level was associated with the lower instance of injuries and ingestions for the treatment group.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 25 to 50 months after birth of child.

Kitzman, H., Olds, D. L., Henderson, C. R., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Tatelbaum, R., et al. (1997). Effect of prenatal and infancy home visitation by nurses on pregnancy outcomes, childhood injuries, and repeated childbearing. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 644-652.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 1139

Population:

  • Age range — 64% less than 19 years of age
  • Race/Ethnicity — 92% African American
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Actively recruited if they had two risk factors: unmarried,

Location / Institution: Memphis, TN

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: free transportation to scheduled prenatal visits only; transportation plus developmental screening and referrals at 6, 12, and 24 months; the above services plus intensive prenatal home visiting services; the above plus continuing nurse visitation through 24 months. Assessments included abstraction of medical records for pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm delivery, low birth-weight, children’s injuries, ingestions, and immunizations. Mothers reported on children’s behavioral problems and their own subsequent pregnancy, educational achievement, and employment. Use of welfare was derived from state records, and children’s mental development was tested. Children visited by nurses have fewer total health care encounters for injuries and ingestions and had fewer outpatient visits for injuries and ingestions. There was no effect on children’s mental development or behavioral problems or mother’s education or employment.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years after birth of child.

Olds, D. L., Eckenrode, J., Henderson, C. R., Kitzman, H., Powers, J., Cole, R., et al. (1997). Long-term effects of home visitation on maternal life course and child abuse and neglect. Fifteen-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 637-643.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 324

Population:

  • Age range — 47% of mothers less than 19 years of age at intake
  • Race/Ethnicity — 89% Caucasian at intake.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Determined at intake to have at least one risk factor: mother < 19, single parent status, or low socioeconomic status.

Location / Institution: Elmira, New York

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study used the same sample as Olds, et al., 1985 and 1994. Volunteers and women recruited due to a risk factor were randomly assigned to one of 4 conditions: Nurse home visitation during the first two years of life, nurse home visitation during pregnancy only, free transportation to regular prenatal and perinatal visits, and sensory and developmental screening at 12 and 24 months only. Assessments at this follow-up included behavioral impairments due to drug or alcohol use, use of welfare, and reviews of Child Protective Services and New York State criminal justice records. Women visited by nurses were less likely to be perpetrators of child abuse and neglect, and had fewer arrests, convictions, and number of days jailed.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 15 years after birth of child.

Eckenrode, J., Ganzel, B., Henderson, C. R., Smith, E., Olds, D. L., Powers, J., et al. (2000). Preventing child abuse and neglect with a program of nurse home visitation. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284(11), 1385-1391.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 324

Population:

  • Age range — 47% of mothers less than 19 years of age at intake
  • Race/Ethnicity — 89% Caucasian mothers at intake
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Mothers determined at intake to have at least one risk factor: mother < 19, single parent status, or low socioeconomic status.

Location / Institution: Semi-rural community in New York

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study used the same sample as Olds, et al., 1985, 1994, 1997, and 1998. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatment groups: Nurse home visitation during the first two years of life, nurse home visitation during pregnancy only, free transportation to regular prenatal and perinatal visits, and sensory and developmental screening at 12 and 24 months only. Mothers were interviewed at 15 years, using a life history calendar designed to help them recall major life events. They also estimated how many months they received Aid to Families with Dependent Children, Medicaid, or food stamps. Mothers reported incidents of domestic violence using the Conflict Tactics Scale and provided consent for researchers to review CPS records. Families receiving nurse visitation during pregnancy and infancy had fewer child maltreatment reports involving mother as perpetrator and study child as victim. The treatment effect decreased as level of overall domestic violence increased. The authors conclude that the presence of domestic violence may limit the effectiveness of early visitation interventions.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 15 years after birth of child.

Olds, D. L., Robinson, J., O’Brien, R., Luckey, D. W., Pettitt, L. M., Henderson, C. R., et al. (2002). Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics, 110(3), 486-496.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 735

Population:

  • Age range — Average 19.8 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Approximately 16% African American, 35% Caucasian and 45% Hispanic.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Recruited from clinics serving low income women if no previous live births and either qualified for Medicaid or had no private health insurance.

Location / Institution: Denver, CO

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Women were assigned to one of three conditions: developmental screening and referral at 6, 12, 15, 21, and 24 months; the above screenings plus home visitation by a paraprofessional during pregnancy and the first 2 years of the child’s life; and equivalent services with home visitations conducted by a nurse. Paraprofessionals were limited to those who had a high school education and no bachelors degree or coursework in a helping profession, in order to gauge the viability of using this type of worker in home visiting in comparison with nurses. The paraprofessionals were recruited from other home visitation programs. At baseline, mothers interviewed to assess socioeconomic conditions, mental health, conflict with partners and their own mothers, and experience of domestic violence. They were also screened for substance abuse. At 12, 15, 21, and 24 months, women were interviewed to assess timing of subsequent pregnancies, work history and use of welfare. Mothers were videotaped in the laboratory and at home to assess responsive interaction with their children. Children were assessed by observation on their interactions with mothers and emotional responses and also on language and cognitive development, using the Mental Development Index. No major differences were found in outcomes between the paraprofessional home visitation group and the control group. Mothers visited by a nurse had fewer and more widely spaced pregnancies, worked more, and showed more responsive interaction with their children. Children visited by a nurse showed fewer language delays and higher mental development.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 years after birth of child.

Olds, D. L., Robinson, J., Pettitt, L. M., Luckey, D. W., Holmberg, J., Ng, R. K., et al. (2004). Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: age 4 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 114, 1560-1568.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 635

Population:

  • Age range — Average 19.8 years at intake
  • Race/Ethnicity — Approximately 16% African American, 35% Caucasian and 45% Hispanic at intake.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Recruited from clinics serving low income women if no previous live births and either qualified for Medicaid or had no private health insurance.

Location / Institution: Denver, CO

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study used the same sample as Olds, et al., 2002. Women were assigned to one of three conditions: developmental screening and referral at 6, 12, 15, 21, and 24 months; the above screenings plus home visitation by a paraprofessional during pregnancy and the first 2 years of the child’s life; and equivalent services with home visitations conducted by a nurse. Paraprofessionals were limited to those who had a high school education and no bachelors degree or coursework in a helping profession, in order to gauge the viability of using this type of worker in home visiting in comparison with nurses. The paraprofessionals were recruited from other home visitation programs. Assessed at this follow-up were maternal reports of subsequent pregnancies, education and work histories, marriage, cohabitation, domestic violence, mental health, substance use, and sense of mastery. Mother-child interaction and the home environment were observed. Children were assessed for language and executive functioning, and mothers reported on children’s externalizing behavior problems. Women visited by paraprofessionals were less likely to be married or live with the biological father of the child, but worked more and had better mental health and sense of mastery. Children visited by paraprofessionals displayed greater sensitivity and responsiveness, and had home environments supportive of early learning. Nurse-visited women had greater intervals between 1st and 2nd children, experienced less domestic violence, and enrolled their children less in formal daycare or preschool. Nurse-visited children had better home environments, better language and executive functioning skills, and better behavioral adaptation during testing.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 4 years after birth of child.

Olds, D. L., Kitzman, H., Hanks, C., Cole, R., Anson, E., Sidora-Arcoleo, K., et al. (2007). Effects of nurse home visiting on maternal and child functioning: Age 9 follow-up of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 120, e832-e845.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 1139 allocated to treatment; 627 seen in this follow-up.

Population:

  • Age range — 64% less than 19 years of age at intake
  • Race/Ethnicity — 92% African American at intake
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Actively recruited if they had two risk factors: unmarried,

Location / Institution: Memphis, TN

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Note: This study used the same sample as Kitzman, et al., 1997 and Olds, et al., 2004. Women were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 conditions: free transportation to scheduled prenatal visits only; transportation plus developmental screening and referrals at 6, 12, and 24 months; the above services plus intensive prenatal home visiting services; the above plus continuing nurse visitation through 24 months. Mothers were assessed at baseline on a created variable called psychological resources, comprised of intelligence, mental health, self-efficacy, and sense of mastery. By the time the child was 9 years old, women visited by a nurse had fewer births and longer intervals between children, used welfare and food stamps for fewer months, and had longer relationships with current partners. Researchers matched participants with the National Death index. Of the 10 children found to have died, control group children were 4.46 times as likely to have died before the 9-year follow-up and more likely to have died by preventable causes (e.g., Sudden Infant Death syndrome.)

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 9 years after birth of child.

Sidora-Arcoleo, K., Anson, E., Lorber, M., Cole, R., Olds, D., & Kitzman, H. (2010). Differential effects of a nurse home-visiting intervention on physically aggressive behavior in children. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 25, 35-45.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 1,139

Population:

  • Age range — 2 to 12 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 92% African American
  • Gender — Females
  • Status — Participants were mothers from the Olds et al. (2007) sample.

Location / Institution: Memphis, TN

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated longitudinal data from the Olds et al. (2007) randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) home visitation program. In the original study, mothers were randomized to one of four treatment conditions. The present study evaluated the long-term effects of the NFP program on physical aggression and verbal ability in girls and boys. Results at 12-year follow-up indicated that there were significant reductions in physical aggression observed among girls in the intervention group at 2 years old and intervention group children of high-psychological-resource mothers at 6 and 12 years old. Mediation analyses suggest that reductions in physical aggression yield increased verbal ability among girls.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 12 years.

Eckenrode, J., Campa, M., Luckey, D. W., Henderson, C. R., Cole, R., Kitzman, H., Anson, E., … Olds, D. (2010). Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19 year follow-up of a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(1), 9-16.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 310

Population:

  • Age range — All 19 years of age
  • Race/Ethnicity — 78% Caucasian and 22% Other
  • Gender — 53% Female and 47% Male
  • Status — Participants were youths whose mothers participated in the Olds et al. (1985) sample.

Location / Institution: Semi-rural country in New York

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated longitudinal data from the Olds et al. (1985) randomized controlled trial of the Nurse-Family Partnership (NFP) home visitation program. In the original study, mothers were randomized to one of four treatment conditions. To obtain follow-up data, youth in the present study completed a telephone interview to assess their histories of arrests, convictions, delinquent and criminal behavior, use of substances, educational achievement, pregnancies, births, and use of welfare. Results indicated that youths whose mothers participated in either of the two treatment groups were less likely to have ever been arrested or convicted than were those in the comparison group. Girls in the nurse-visited group also had fewer lifetime arrests and convictions than did those in the comparison group. Girls in the nurse-visited group born to high-risk (un-married and low-income) mothers had fewer children and were less likely to have received Medicaid than were high-risk girls in the comparison group. The major study limitation was the reliance on youth self-report as the only outcome measure.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 19 years.

References

Dawley, K., Loch, J., & Bindrich, I. (2007). The Nurse-Family Partnership. American Journal of Nursing, 107(11):60-67.

Hill, P., Uris, P., & Bauer, T. (2007). The Nurse-Family Partnership: A Policy Priority, American Journal of Nursing, 107(11): 73-75.

Isaacs, J. B. (2007). Cost-effective investments in children. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institute January Budget Options series (Budgeting for National Priorities); www.brookings.edu/views/papers/200701isaacs.pdf.

Contact Information

Name: Erika Messenger Bantz
Title: Director of Program Development
Agency/Affiliation: Nurse-Family Partnership - National Service Office
Website: www.nursefamilypartnership.org
Email:
Phone: (866) 864-5226
Fax: (303) 951-3882

Date Reviewed: June 2011 (originally reviewed in April 2008)