Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP)

Scientific Rating:
2
Supported by Research Evidence
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Substance Abuse Treatment (Adult).

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Women who used alcohol or drugs heavily during pregnancy and who are not effectively connected with community service providers, and their children. Women are enrolled during pregnancy or up to 6 months postpartum.

Maternal alcohol/drug abuse puts children at risk because of possible effects of prenatal exposure on the child’s health and because these mothers are likely to provide a compromised home environment. These problems are preventable by helping the mothers build healthy and independent lives. Since 1991, PCAP has served high-risk mothers who abuse alcohol/drugs during pregnancy and their families using a theory-based model (relational theory, stages of change, and harm reduction). PCAP intervention activities are conducted by trained and supervised case managers who each work with 16 families for 3 years, beginning during pregnancy or postpartum. PCAP case managers have experienced similar adverse life circumstances as clients, have subsequently achieved success in important ways, are positive role models, and offer hope from a realistic perspective. They provide regular home visitation, and help clients obtain treatment and stay in recovery. They connect families with comprehensive services including health, housing, parenting, and vocational services.

Essential Components

  • PCAP is a three-year home visitation model, implemented by trained and closely supervised paraprofessional case managers (CMs).
  • PCAP does not provide direct alcohol or drug treatment or clinical services, and instead links women and their families with a comprehensive array of appropriate and available community resources and services.
  • To facilitate an effective service plan, CMs coordinate with the network of client’s service providers and organize regular team case consultations.
  • CMs develop a network of contacts and relationships with client’s family and friends, and provide advocacy for other family members as needed.
  • Clients are not asked to leave the program because of relapse or setbacks.
  • Case management begins at enrollment during the mother’s pregnancy or postpartum.
  • CMs conduct an initial needs assessment using The Difference Game, (a card sort assessment developed by PCAP in 1997 and being used in U.S. and Canada). They use this assessment to help clients define individualized goals and incremental (‘baby’) steps required to meet those goals. Goals and steps are added and modified as client makes progress. Goals are evaluated every four months.
  • A full PCAP site is comprised of one full-time clinical supervisor and six case managers. Caseload recommendation is 16 active client families per CM.
  • CMs receive a minimum of twice monthly individual supervision and attend twice monthly group staffing meetings.
  • Program evaluation is an integrated part of PCAP. Ongoing program evaluation allows for generation of outcomes on both current and exiting clients.
  • CMs are required to complete evaluation instruments according to PCAP protocol.

Child Component

Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Health risks (including lack of immunizations), possibility of an unsafe or unstable home, risk of out-of-home placement, infants heavily exposed to alcohol or drugs in utero.

Age range: 0 – 3

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Co-occurring substance abuse and mental health disorders, and problems associated with these disorders including health, domestic violence, housing, child welfare, and legal issues.

Group Format

Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) was not designed to be conducted in a group setting, and has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Birth Family Home
  • Community Agency
  • Foster Home
  • Residential Care Facility

Homework

This program does not include a homework component.

Languages

Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) has materials available in a language other than English:

Spanish

The "Difference Game" card sort needs assessment (cards and instructions) is available in Spanish.

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

  • Office space and desks for 6 CMs and a supervisor
  • At least 3 computers with high-speed internet for web-based data entry
  • Cell phones for field communication
  • Recommended: vehicles for transport of mothers and children to important appointments

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Case Managers need an A.A. degree and at least four years of prior community-based experience, or the equivalent combination of education and experience. From this pool of people, the program values staff who have experienced some of the same types of adverse life circumstances as clients (but usually not to the same degree), and who have subsequently achieved success in important ways. If staff are in recovery, at the time of hire they must be clean and sober for at least 5 years and be maintaining a recovery-oriented lifestyle.

Supervisors need at least Master's level training in a mental health field and extensive clinical supervisory experience.

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
  • Therese M. Grant, PhD, Director
    Washington State Parent-Child Assistance Program

    phone: (206) 543-7155
Training is obtained:

Training provided onsite or in Seattle. Field observation and practice provided in Seattle.

Number of days/hours:
  • Training on model: 5-day training and follow-up consultation
  • Field observation and practice: 5-day
  • Training on evaluation (recommended): 4-day training
Additional Resources:

There currently are additional qualified resources for training:

Additional University of Washington qualified trainers:

For evaluation:

  • Cara Ernst, MA
    email: ccernst@u.washington.edu
  • Ron Jackson, MSW
    email: ronjack@u.washington.edu

For intervention model:

  • Nancy Whitney, MS
    email: nwhitney@u.washington.edu

Website with protocols and evaluation materials: depts.washington.edu/pcapuw/

Implementation Information

Since Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP) is highly rated on the Scientific Rating Scale, information was requested from the program representative on available pre-implementation assessments, implementation tools, and/or fidelity measures.

Show implementation information...

Pre-Implementation Assessments

To be given to organizations or providers in order to measure organizational or individual readiness:

PCAP does have a pre-implementation assessment tool, PCAP Pre-implementation Checklist, which is available at depts.washington.edu/pcapuw/.

The person who can assist in examining pre-implementation readiness is:

Implementation Tools — for the program (e.g., implementation guides or manuals)

The PCAP e-manual is accessible through a link on the PCAP website: depts.washington.edu/pcapuw/.

The person who can assist access to the manual is:

Fidelity Measures

There is a fidelity checklist of PCAP Core Components that has been used for a federally-funded PCAP replication project. The fidelity instrument is included in the PCAP e-manual noted above.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "2 - Supported by Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one rigorous randomized controlled trial with a sustained effect of at least 6 months. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcomes: Safety, Permanency and Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Ernst, C. C., Grant, T. M., Streissguth, A. P., & Samson, P. D. (1999). Intervention with high-risk alcohol and drug-abusing mothers: II. Three-year findings from the Seattle model of paraprofessional advocacy. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(1), 19-38.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial, with small amount of adjustment to balance samples
Number of Participants: 65 clients, 31 controls

Population:

  • Age range — Average 27 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Intervention group: 48% African American, 29% White, 15% Native American, 8% Hispanic/Asian/Other. Control group: 36% African American, 42% White, 16% Native American, 6% Hispanic/Asian/Other
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Women who abused alcohol/drugs during pregnancy, and their infants; recruited via hospital post-partum screening or from community provider referrals.

Location / Institution: Seattle, WA.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Women were randomly assigned to three years of intensive home visitation/case management (intervention group) or the community standard of care (control group). Participants were interviewed pre and post-intervention regarding substance use, risk and protective factors, and use of community services. A composite summary score was computed for overall well-being. The intervention group participants obtained significantly higher outcome summary scores; those who spent more time with case managers had more positive outcomes.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

Kartin, D., Grant, T. M., Streissguth, A. P., Sampson, P. D., & Ernst, C. C. (2002). Three year development outcomes in children with prenatal alcohol and drug exposure. Pediatric Physical Therapy, 14, 145-153.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial, with small amount of adjustment to balance samples
Number of Participants: 53 clients, 25 controls

Population:

  • Age range — Not Specified
  • Race/Ethnicity — Clients: 50.9% African American, 26.4% White, 15.1% Native American; 7.6% Other. Controls: 25.5% African American, 50.0% White, 20.8% Native American, 4.2% Other.
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Women who abused alcohol/drugs during pregnancy, and their infants; recruited via hospital post-partum screening or from community provider referrals.

Location / Institution: Seattle, WA.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
(Note: this analysis uses children from the sample described in Ernst et al., 1999). Women were randomly assigned to three years of intensive home visitation/case management (intervention group) or the community standard of care (control group). At intervention exit, children were evaluated using the Mental, Motor, and Behavior Rating Scales of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development Second Edition (BSID-II). Results indicated that scores, on average, were lower than expected for age among both the intervention and control groups. Previous research suggests that the home-visiting intervention showed positive results for mothers; however it was not sufficient to address the needs of children exposed to prenatal alcohol and drugs.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 3 years after program enrollment.

Grant, T., Ernst, C. C., Pagaliauan, G., & Streissguth, A. (2003). Post-program follow-up effects of a paraprofessional intervention with high-risk women who abused alcohol and drugs during pregnancy. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(3), 211-222.

Type of Study: Post-program follow-up descriptive study
Number of Participants: 48 clients

Population:

  • Age range — Not Specified
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Mothers at-risk for alcohol/drug abuse; former PCAP participants originally recruited via hospital post-partum screening or from community provider referrals.

Location / Institution: Seattle, WA.

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
(Note: This study uses the same sample as Ernst et al. 1999.) Interviews were conducted to obtain information on alcohol and drug use, use of family planning and community services. Clients were interviewed at intervention enrollment, at intervention completion 3 years later, and 2.5 years after completing the intervention. Located mothers were significantly more likely to have abstained from alcohol and drugs for 6 months or more and had fewer subsequent children. They were also more likely to be living in permanent housing and less likely to have been incarcerated. A limitation to this analysis is the lack of comparison with the control group.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2.5 years post-treatment

Grant, T. M., Ernst, C. C., Streissguth, A., & Stark, K. (2005). Preventing alcohol and drug exposed births in Washington State: Intervention findings from three Parent-Child Assistance Program sites. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 471-490.

Type of Study: Pretest/Posttest
Number of Participants: 216 women

Population:

  • Age range — Average 28 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 47% White, 37% African American, 9% Native American, and 7% Other
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Women who abused alcohol/drugs during pregnancy, and their infants; recruited via hospital post-partum screening or from community provider referrals.

Location / Institution: Washington State

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
(Note: This study includes some participants from the Ernst et al. 1999 study.) Pretest-posttest comparison was made across three PCAP sites: the original demonstration (OD) (1991-1995), and two replication sites (1996-2003). Women were interviewed using the Addiction Severity Index with supplemental questions on pregnancy substance use, contraception, and use of community services. On an endpoint summary score, each of the replication samples performed significantly better than the OD (p

Length of post-intervention follow-up: None.

References

Grant, T. M., Ernst, C. C., McAuliff, S., & Streissguth A. P. (1997). The Difference Game: Facilitating change in high-risk clients. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 78(4): 429–432.

Grant, T. M., Ernst, C. C., & Streissguth, A. P. (1999). Intervention with high-risk alcohol and drug-abusing mothers: I. Administrative strategies of the Seattle model of paraprofessional advocacy. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(1): 1–18.

Grant, T. M., Youngblood Pedersen, J., Whitney, N., & Ernst, E. (2007). The role of therapeutic intervention with substance abusing mothers: Preventing FASD in the next generation. In Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: The Diagnostic, Natural History and Therapeutic Issues Through the Lifespan. K. O’Malley (Ed.). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

Contact Information

Name: Therese M. Grant, PhD
Title: Director
Agency/Affiliation: University of Washington School of Medicine
Department: Washington State Parent-Child Assistance Program (PCAP), Fetal Alcohol and Drug Unit, Dept. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Website: depts.washington.edu/chdd/ucedd/ctu_5/parentchildprog_5.html
Email:
Phone: (206) 543-7155
Fax: (206) 685-2903

Date Reviewed: December 2010 (originally reviewed in October 2009)