Home  «  Program  « 

Subsidized Guardianship

Scientific Rating:
3
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Rating:
1
High
See scale of 1-3

Note: The Subsidized Guardianship program was not responsive to the CEBC's inquiry. The following information was obtained from publicly available sources.

Brief Description

The Subsidized Guardianship program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Child Welfare Initiatives.

  • Child Welfare Outcome: Permanency
  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Not Specified

Subsidized Guardianship is intended to provide an alternative to foster care for children who cannot be reunited with their parents and for whom permanent adoption is not an option. Under the system, children are cared for by legal guardians, often family members, who receive financial assistance similar to that received by foster parents. Parents may also retain certain rights, such as visitation, that they would not necessarily have in the case of adoption. The program relieves the child welfare system of the level of administrative and caseworker oversight required by foster care, and transfer to a legal guardian helps to assure greater permanency of the placement, since only the court can remove the child.

Education and Training Resources

Publicly available information indicates there is some training available for this program.
See contact info below.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "3 - Promising Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one study utilizing some form of control (e.g., untreated group, placebo group, matched wait list study) establishing the practice's benefit over the placebo, or found it to be comparable to or better than an appropriate comparison practice. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Testa, M. F. (2002). Subsidized Guardianship: Testing an idea whose time has finally come. Social Work Research, 26(3), 145-158.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: Experimental: 3,181; Control: 3,339; Observational: 20,061

Population:

  • Age range — 0-17
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — Not Specified
  • Status — Children in care of the Child Welfare System.

Location / Institution: Illinois

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
Children in care were randomly assigned to be placed in either kinship care where subsidized guardianship would be implemented or to foster homes. Rates of permanence and stability were assessed. Results showed that subsidized guardianship was associated with an increase in permanence of placement, but not in stability. The authors suggest that it is possible that stability may be determined by factors other than legal relationship.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: Up to approximately 1 year.

References

Bissell, M., & Miller, J. (eds.) (2004). Using Subsidized Guardianship to improve outcomes for children: Key questions to consider. Children's Defense Fund and Cornerstone Consulting Group. Retrieved from the World Wide Web on March 16, 2010, from: cdf.childrensdefense.org/site/DocServer/UsingSubsidizedGuardianship.pdf?docID=1521.

Contact Information

Agency/Affiliation: University of Illinois
Department: Children and Family Research Center
Email:
Phone: (800) 638-3877

Date Reviewed: June 2008