Home  «  Program  «  Think Kids  « 

Think:Kids

Scientific Rating:
3
See scale of 1-5
Child Welfare Relevance Level:
Medium

See descriptions of 3 levels

Brief Description

The information in this program outline is provided by the program representative and edited by the CEBC staff. The Think:Kids program has been rated by the CEBC in the area of: Disruptive Behavior Treatment (Child & Adolescent).

  • Types of Maltreatment: Does not target any specific kind of maltreatment
  • Target Population: Children and adolescents with a variety of behavioral challenges, including both externalizing (e.g., explosions, meltdowns, tantrums) and internalizing (e.g., implosions, shutdowns, withdrawal).  The children and adolescents carry a variety of psychiatric diagnoses, including Oppositional Defiant Disorder, Conduct Disorder, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Mood Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorders, etc.

Think:Kids teaches an approach for helping children with behavioral challenges where through training, support and clinical services, the understanding that challenging kids lack the skill, not the will, to behave well is promoted. Specifically, skills related to problem solving, flexibility, and frustration tolerance are emphasized. Unlike traditional models of discipline, this approach avoids the use of power, control, and motivational procedures and instead focuses on teaching at-risk kids the skills they need to succeed.

Not long ago, kids who had trouble reading were thought of as lazy or dumb. Today, people recognize that these kids have a learning disability that simply requires a different method of teaching. Think:Kids aims to accomplish a similar shift in perspective and practice with behaviorally challenging kids. Rather than try to motivate these kids to behave better, this approach teaches skills through a process of helping adults and kids learn how to resolve problems collaboratively.

The goals of Think:Kids are to:

  • Pursue high priority adult expectations.
  • Reduce challenging child behavior.
  • Create (or restore) a helping relationship between the adult and the child.
  • Clarify what crucial thinking skills need to be taught to the child and start teaching them.
  • Solve chronic problems so they don’t keep coming up.

Essential Components

The essential components of Think:Kids include:

  • Assessment of the specific thinking skill deficits and unsolved problems that are setting the stage for the challenging behavior. There are five main areas of thinking skill deficits:
    • Executive Functioning
    • Language Processing
    • Emotion Regulation
    • Cognitive Flexibility
    • Social Skills
  • Delineation of the three specific and unique options for responding to unsolved problems/unmet expectations and what each accomplishes:
    • Plan A – Imposition of adult will
    • Plan B – Solve the problem collaboratively
    • Plan C – Drop the expectation (for now, at least)
  • Successfully engage in proactive problem solving in a collaborative manner in order to solve problems durably, pursue adult expectations, reduce challenging behaviors, teach skills, and create or restore a helping relationship.

Child Component

Think:Kids was designed with a child component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • A range of internalizing and externalizing behaviors, including (but not limited to) physical and verbal aggression, destruction of property, self-harm, substance abuse, tantrums, meltdowns, explosions, implosive behaviors (shutting down), crying, pouting, whining, withdrawal, defiance, and oppositionality.

Age range: 3 – 21

Developmental Delays:

This program was not developed for children with developmental delays, and has not been tested for children with developmental delays.

Treatment Involves Family/Support Structures:

This program involves the family or other support systems in the individual's treatment: Caregivers, educators, and other supports are essential to the success of the approach.  Caregivers, teachers, etc. are taught the approach, and are given opportunities to practice the approach with the child, so that they can intervene outside the context of the clinical setting. Caregivers are introduced the approach through various means such as parent training workshops, written materials, and video and online trainings. Individual sessions with a therapist provide the opportunity for more intensive work.  Typically, these sessions involve the parents as well as the child and are used to practice and troubleshoot the problem solving process.  Parent groups can also occur and these can take the form of a more open-ended support group facilitated by a certified mentor (typically a parent who has utilized the approach with their own child(ren) and have gone through the Think Kids’ mentor certification process) or a time-limited psychoeducational multifamily parent group.  These groups tend to be either monthly or biweekly.  School staff typically learn the model via single or multi-day workshops and through follow-up training and consultation.

Parent / Caregiver Component

Think:Kids was designed with a parent/caregiver component that addresses the following presenting problems and symptoms:

  • Challenging, oppositional or defiant behavior from the child as well as other social, emotional and behavioral challenges.

Group Format

Think:Kids was designed to be conducted in a group setting; but has not been tested for use in a group setting.

Recommended group size:

Approximately 12 people

Testing References:

Delivery Settings

This program is typically conducted in a(n):

  • Adoptive Home
  • Birth Family Home
  • Community Agency
  • Foster Home
  • Hospital
  • Outpatient Clinic
  • Residential Care Facility
  • School

Homework

Think:Kids includes a homework component:

Delineation and prioritization of unsolved problems, reduction of imposition of adult will, practice of problem solving process.

Languages

Think:Kids has materials available in a language other than English:

French

For information on which materials are available in this language, please check on the program's website or contact the program representative (contact information is listed at the bottom of this page).

Resources Needed to Run Program

The typical resources for implementing the program are:

Trained personnel. Parent support groups and multifamily psychoeducational groups require a room big enough to hold the number of families (anywhere from a couple of parents up to 12 or so). Therapy sessions are conducted in typical therapeutic settings, such as a residential facility, inpatient unit, outpatient clinic, or private practice settings, and require the typical clinical set-up.

Minimum Provider Qualifications

Program can be implemented by any of the following trained individuals: a certified parent mentor (parent, grandparent, child care provider), a school mental health provider, or a clinician (any mental health clinician such as a licensed psychologist, master’s level psychotherapist, licensed social worker, etc.).

Education and Training Resources

There is a manual that describes how to implement this program, and there is training available for this program.

Training Contact:
  • Beth Edelstein, Director of Outreach and Support Programs
    Think:Kids at Massachusetts General Hospital

    phone: (617) 643-6300
Training is obtained:

Onsite, local (in Boston), video/phone consultation.

Number of days/hours:

Ranges from 1 day introductory session to more intensive (2-3 day) advanced sessions as well as hourly consultation and supervision.

Additional Resources:

There currently are additional qualified resources for training:

There are many certified trainers throughout North America who teach the model as well. The list is available at http://www.thinkkids.org/map/.

Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research

This program is rated a "3 - Promising Research Evidence" on the Scientific Rating Scale based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The practice must have at least one study utilizing some form of control (e.g., untreated group, placebo group, matched wait list study) establishing the practice's benefit over the placebo, or found it to be comparable to or better than an appropriate comparison practice. Please see the Scientific Rating Scale for more information.

Child Welfare Outcome: Child/Family Well-Being

Show relevant research...

Greene, R. W., Ablon J. S., Monuteaux, M. C., Goring, J. C., Henin, A, Raezer-Blakely, L., … Biederman, J. (2004). Effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving in affectively dysregulated children with oppositional defiant disorder: Initial findings. Psychiatric Services, 72(6), 1157-1164.

Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of Participants: 47

Population:

  • Age range — 4 to 12 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — 32 Males and 15 Females
  • Status — Participants were children with oppositional defiant disorder who were referred to an outpatient mental health clinic specializing in the treatment of disruptive behavior disorders at a university hospital.

Location / Institution: Massachusetts

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated the effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) [on which Think:Kids is based] compared to a 10-week parent training (PT) curriculum in a sample of affectively dysregulated children with oppositional defiant disorder. Participants were randomly assigned to CPS or PT treatment groups and parents attended group therapy sessions. Parents were administered the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Epidemiologic version (K-SADS-E), Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised, Parent-Child Relationship Inventory (PCRI), Parenting Stress Index (PSI), ODD Rating Scale (ODDRS), and the Clinical Global Impression (CGI). Results indicated that CPS produced significant improvements across multiple domains of functioning at post-treatment and 4-month follow-up and were superior to the improvements in the PT sample. Major study limitations included a relatively small sample size and short follow-up length.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 4 months.

Greene, R. W., Ablon, J. S., & Martin, A. (2006). Use of Collaborative Problem Solving to reduce seclusion and restraint in child and adolescent inpatient units. Psychiatric Services, 57(5): 610-612.

Type of Study: One group pretest-posttest design
Number of Participants: 100

Population:

  • Age range — 3 to 14 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — 74 Males and 26 Females
  • Status — Participants were children and adolescents with trauma histories and severe oppositional defiance and aggressiveness who were admitted to an inpatient treatment facility.

Location / Institution: Massachusetts

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated the effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) [on which Think:Kids is based] on staff restraint use in a sample of children and adolescents in an inpatient treatment program for severe oppositional defiance and aggressiveness. The intervention provided biweekly staff training sessions that lasted one year on restraint training using the CPS model. Surveys administered to staff during at a 15-month post-intervention follow-up showed a significant decrease in rates of restraint and seclusion and a decrease in the length of restraint procedures and injuries. Limitations include lack of randomization and lack of a control or comparison group.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 15 months.

Martin, A., Krieg, H., Esposito, F., Stubbe, D., & Cardona, L. (2008). Reduction of restraint and seclusion through Collaborative Problem Solving: A five-year, prospective inpatient study. Psychiatric Services, 59(12), 1406-1412.

Type of Study: One group pretest-posttest design
Number of Participants: 755

Population:

  • Age range — 3 to 15 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — 52% Caucasian, 25% African American, and 23% Hispanic
  • Gender — 64% Male and 36% Female
  • Status — Participants were children and adolescents with aggressive behaviors who were admitted to an inpatient treatment facility from 2003 to 2007.

Location / Institution: Yale-New Haven Children’s Hospital

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated the effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) [on which Think:Kids is based] on staff restraint use in a sample of children and adolescents in an inpatient treatment program with aggressive behaviors. Staff participated in biweekly video conferences with CPS developers and attended lectures on program implementation for a period of 6 months. Data were collected for three years before and 1.5 years training. Results indicated that marked reductions in the use of restraint and seclusion occurred throughout program implementation and the rate of restraint was significantly lower at follow-up. Limitations included lack of randomization and lack of a control or comparison group.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: Not Specified

Epstein, T. & Saltzman-Benaiah, J. (2010). Parenting children with disruptive behaviors: Evaluation of a Collaborative Problem Solving pilot program. Journal of Clinical Psychology Practice, 1, 27-40.

Type of Study: One group pretest-posttest design
Number of Participants: 12

Population:

  • Age range — 6 to 12 years
  • Race/Ethnicity — Not Specified
  • Gender — 83% Male and 17% Female
  • Status — Participants were the parents of children with Tourette syndrome and oppositional defiant disorder who were patients at the Tourette Syndrome Neurodevelopmental Clinic (TSNC).

Location / Institution: Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations)
The study evaluated the effectiveness of Collaborative Problem Solving (CPS) [on which Think:Kids is based] in families with children with Tourette syndrome and oppositional defiant disorder. Parents completed the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI), Social Competence Scale, and the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-SF) at four time points: baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention, and at 2-month follow-up. Program staff administered the Oppositional Defiant Disorder Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Scale during parent phone interviews at four time points. Two separate treatment groups were completed approximately one year apart. Results indicated that a significant reduction in parenting stress occurred for mothers as a result of the intervention and parents reported increased empathy for child problem behaviors. Limitations included small sample size, lack of randomization, and lack of a no-treatment control or comparison group.

Length of post-intervention follow-up: 2 months.

References

Greene, R. W., & Ablon, J. S. (2005). Treating explosive kids: The Collaborative problem solving approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Greene, R. W., Ablon, J. S. (2003). Disruptive behavior disorders. In M. J. Breen & C. R. Fiedler (Eds). Behavioral approach to assessment of youth with emotional/behavioral disorders (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Greene, R. W., Ablon, J. S., Goring, J. C., Fazio, V., & Morse, L. R. (2003). Treatment of oppositional defiant disorder in children and adolescents. In P. Barrett & T.H. Ollendick (Eds.), Handbook of Interventions that work with children and adolescents: Prevention and treatment. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Contact Information

Name: J. Stuart Ablon, PhD
Agency/Affiliation: Think:Kids at Massachusetts General Hospital
Website: www.thinkkids.org
Email:
Phone: (617) 643-6024 or (617) 643-9715

Date Reviewed: September 2011