The research evidence was assessed for each screening and assessment tool and a rating was provided. Please note that all ratings are based on the English version of the measure unless otherwise noted in the tool’s description. A – Psychometrics Well-Demonstrated B – Psychometrics Demonstrated C – Does Not Reach Acceptable Levels of Psychometrics NR – Not … Continued
As a new or experienced user of the CEBC website, you might wonder how the CEBC review process works; including how the level of Child Welfare System Relevance is determined, and whether programs can be rated on the Scientific Rating Scale. The review process is described through the links below, as well as in the CEBC Rating Policy and … Continued
The purpose of the CEBC Scientific Rating scale is to evaluate each practice based on the available research evidence. A lower score indicates a greater level of research support. The graphic representation of the scale is shown below: Specific criteria for each classification system category are presented below: A one-page printable Overview of the CEBC Scientific Rating … Continued
There are two rating scales used on the CEBC website. Please see their descriptions below: Scientific Rating Scale This scale is a 1 to 5 rating of the strength of the research evidence supporting a practice or program. A scientific rating of 1 represents a practice with the strongest research evidence and a 5 represents … Continued
In addition to providing consumers with information about the research evidence for child welfare related programs, the CEBC also provides information about implementation for programs that have been shown to be supported by research evidence or have promising research evidence. A representative from each program rated on the CEBC website was asked to provide additional … Continued
Upcoming Webinars and Training Archive The CEBC is collaborating with our partner project, California Training Institute (CalTrin), to deliver professional development and extended learning opportunities that focus on evidence-based solutions to issues that span both child abuse prevention and child welfare. Check out this month’s webinars. New Topic Areas Added to CEBC The CEBC launched the … Continued
Privacy: RCHSD Privacy Policy Conflict of Interest: Unless otherwise clearly stated, Rady Children’s Hospital and Health Center and the individual staff and Scientific Panel members involved in the review process do not have a financial interest in the development or dissemination of any specific model listed on the CEBC website. Limitations of the Review Process: … Continued
Many child welfare agencies use some form of differential response (DR), also known as alternative response, multiple track response, dual track, or family assessment response. Through DR, lower-risk cases receive a more supportive, service-oriented, and strengths-focused approach, as opposed to the traditional assessment and intervention process. Given limited resources, child welfare services have typically focused … Continued
Presented at the 36th Annual San Diego International Conference on Child and Family Maltreatment in San Diego, CA, on January 27, 2021. Evidence registries are used to make service array decisions. This presentation will explain the Title IV-E Prevention Services Clearinghouse, which was developed for the Family First Prevention Services Act. Then, similarities and differences with two well-established … Continued
