The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare
The California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare

This document was printed from the website of the California Evidence-Based Clearinghouse for Child Welfare (CEBC), which you can access at http://www.cebc4cw.org/

Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3)

1. Well-Supported by Research Evidence
2. Supported by Research Evidence
3. Promising Research Evidence
4. Fails to Demonstrate Effect
5. Concerning Practice
NR. Not able to be Rated

Here are your search results for programs in the Topic Area - Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3):

The programs listed below have a full program description. They have been reviewed by the CEBC and, if appropriate, been rated using the Scientific Rating Scale. You can see the full rating scale on the right.

Occasionally program representatives who are invited to submit information on their program decline or do not respond, click here to see if there are any declining or non-responding programs for Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3)

You can also read why the Advisory Committee chose Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3) as a topic area at the bottom of this page.



Programs with a Scientific Rating of 1 - Well-Supported by Research Evidence

  1. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT)

Programs with a Scientific Rating of 2 - Supported by Research Evidence

  1. Child Parent Psychotherapy (CPP)
  2. Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care for Preschoolers (MTFC-P)

Programs with a Scientific Rating of 3 - Promising Research Evidence

  1. Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC)
  2. Theraplay

Programs with a Scientific Rating of NR - Not able to be Rated

  1. Circle of Security (COS)

See why Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3) was selected by the Advisory Committee.

What is Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3) as it relates to Child Welfare?

Infants and Toddlers make up one third of all admissions into the child welfare system and, once they are in care, young children remain longer and are more likely to be abused and neglected. New advances in neurophysiologic research indicate that trauma from physical and sexual abuse and neglect dramatically and adversely affects the structure and development of the brain. The research also indicates that many of the negative impacts to the brain’s neural structure are potentially reversible. The need for timely interventions to help rewire the brain and eliminate potential future behavioral and learning problems for foster children is critical for the Child Welfare system. One potential intervention is Infant and Toddler Mental Health which offers ways of conceptualizing early attachment disruptions and intervening through parental/caretaker guidance, supportive counseling, and parent/infant dyadic psychotherapy. Infant and toddler mental health approaches support the child within the context of his/her relationship with parents and other primary caretakers. Infant and toddler mental health also helps develop capacity in the child for expressing emotions, forming close and secure relationships, and mastering their environment. Infant and toddler mental health can potentially interface across the Child Welfare service continuum, from working with parents and their infants/toddlers in prevention-based voluntary services to supporting structured visitation processes with the infant/toddler and their mother while attempting to reunify. Infant and toddler mental health could also potentially play a key role in supporting the relationship between the care provider and the reunifying parent through a permanency teaming approach.

Why Infant and Toddler Mental Health (0-3) was chosen by the Advisory Committee? Infant and Toddler Mental Health was selected by the Advisory Committee because infants and toddlers represent the fastest growing age group of children being removed from their homes as a result of abuse or neglect and placed in foster care in the United States. Nationally, approximately 50,000 infants under 12 months (NCANDS) enter foster care every year. These children are the most vulnerable for many reasons, including their small stature, dependency on adults, and compromised ability to communicate and protect themselves. For instance, according to National Data (NCANDS) for 2007, children younger than 1 year accounted for 42.2 % of all child fatalities, while children younger than 4 years accounted for more than three quarters of all child fatalities. Combine the disturbing child fatality data with scientific evidence through neuro-brain imaging that 75% of the brains wiring occurs by age 1, and 90% by age 5 (New Directions Institute for Infant Brain Development) as well as research that indicates trauma from abuse adversely impacts proper neural development and the gauntlet has been thrown to Child Welfare. Child Welfare must integrate evidence-based strategies at key strategic points in the continuum of services that maximize healthy relationships for the 0-3 child in order to minimize and mitigate harmful impacts on brain development and future negative behavior. Child Welfare must change the negative trajectory that foster children often face from failed reunifications, failed attachments, and increased problems of emotional disturbance which can lead to multiple disruptions in placements and eventually involvement with drugs, prostitution, and the criminal justice system.

Howard Himes, MSW
Deputy Director
Fresno County Dept. of Children and Family Services