Safer Sex Intervention (SSI)
Topic Areas
Topic Areas
Child Welfare System Relevance Level
Low
Target Population
Sexually active female adolescents and young adults
For children/adolescents ages: 13 - 23
Target Population
Sexually active female adolescents and young adults
For children/adolescents ages: 13 - 23
Program Overview
The Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) is designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors among young women at risk for adverse reproductive health outcomes. The sexual risk behaviors addressed include having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception. SSI is administered one-on-one and face-to-face by a female health educator in a clinical setting. The 30- to 50-minute session follows one of two intervention guides, selected based on the young person's stage of behavior change. Booster sessions are offered at 1, 3, and 6 months postintervention.
Program Overview
The Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) is designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors among young women at risk for adverse reproductive health outcomes. The sexual risk behaviors addressed include having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception. SSI is administered one-on-one and face-to-face by a female health educator in a clinical setting. The 30- to 50-minute session follows one of two intervention guides, selected based on the young person's stage of behavior change. Booster sessions are offered at 1, 3, and 6 months postintervention.
Contact Information
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
- Agency/Affiliation: Boston Children's Hospital
- Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
- Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
- Phone: (617) 355-8306
Contact Information
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
- Agency/Affiliation: Boston Children's Hospital
- Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
- Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
- Phone: (617) 355-8306
Program Goals
The goals of the Safer Sex Intervention are:
- Reduce sexual risk behaviors, including sex without a condom, sex with a nonmain partner, and sex without contraception
- Improve safer sex attitudes and intentions, including positive attitudes toward condoms, intention to use condoms, and intention to use contraception
- Reduce adverse reproductive health outcomes, including repeat sexually transmitted infection (STI), any incident STI, and unplanned pregnancy
Program Goals
The goals of the Safer Sex Intervention are:
- Reduce sexual risk behaviors, including sex without a condom, sex with a nonmain partner, and sex without contraception
- Improve safer sex attitudes and intentions, including positive attitudes toward condoms, intention to use condoms, and intention to use contraception
- Reduce adverse reproductive health outcomes, including repeat sexually transmitted infection (STI), any incident STI, and unplanned pregnancy
Logic Model
Logic Model
Essential Components
The essential components of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) include:
- Administers sessions on a one-on-one and face-to-face basis with a female health educator in a clinical setting
- Uses one 30-50 minute session to evaluate the young woman and administer the main session of SSI
- Evaluates a young person's stage of behavior change about sexual risk behaviors (e.g., having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception) using self-reporting and health evaluator input
- Uses the evaluation to place the young person into one of two categories based on their stage of behavior change
- Uses the SSI guide that is appropriate for the young person's stage of behavior change category
- Draws on behavior change theory and approaches to counseling (Social Cognitive Theory, Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, Motivational Interviewing)
- Includes information and activities in the SSI guides that are related to condom use, contraception, and sexual refusal
- Provides booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months or at similar intervals aligned with other aspects of care
Essential Components
The essential components of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) include:
- Administers sessions on a one-on-one and face-to-face basis with a female health educator in a clinical setting
- Uses one 30-50 minute session to evaluate the young woman and administer the main session of SSI
- Evaluates a young person's stage of behavior change about sexual risk behaviors (e.g., having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception) using self-reporting and health evaluator input
- Uses the evaluation to place the young person into one of two categories based on their stage of behavior change
- Uses the SSI guide that is appropriate for the young person's stage of behavior change category
- Draws on behavior change theory and approaches to counseling (Social Cognitive Theory, Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, Motivational Interviewing)
- Includes information and activities in the SSI guides that are related to condom use, contraception, and sexual refusal
- Provides booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months or at similar intervals aligned with other aspects of care
Program Delivery
Child/Adolescent Services
Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) directly provides services to children and addresses the following:
- Sexual risk behaviors
Recommended Intensity
One 30- to 50-minute session Three 15- to 20-minute booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months
Recommended Duration
6 months (but for individuals not willing or able to follow-up, may be as short as a single session)
Delivery Settings
This program is typically conducted in a(n):
- Outpatient Clinic
Homework
This program does not include a homework component.
Resources Needed to Run Program
The typical resources for implementing the program are:
Personnel and a private room
Program Delivery
Child/Adolescent Services
Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) directly provides services to children and addresses the following:
- Sexual risk behaviors
Recommended Intensity
One 30- to 50-minute session Three 15- to 20-minute booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months
Recommended Duration
6 months (but for individuals not willing or able to follow-up, may be as short as a single session)
Delivery Settings
This program is typically conducted in a(n):
- Outpatient Clinic
Homework
This program does not include a homework component.
Resources Needed to Run Program
The typical resources for implementing the program are:
Personnel and a private room
Manuals and Training
Prerequisite/Minimum Provider Qualifications
Bachelor's degree plus training and experience in sexual health/family planning with adolescents and young adults
Manual Information
There is a manual that describes how to deliver this program.
Program Manual(s)
Manual information:
- Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, J. (2016). Safer Sex Intervention (SSI).
The manual is available for a fee, on request via email to SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Training Information
There is training available for this program.
Training Contact
-
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
Title: Developer, Safer Sex Intervention
Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Phone: (617) 355-8306
Training Type/Location:
Arrangements for training must be made with Dr. Shrier or her delegate. Training can be provided on-site or in Boston, depending on logistics.
Number of days/hours:
1.5 days for train-the-facilitator training, 2 days for train-the-trainer training, and half a day for the motivational interviewing workshop
"What is included the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
Manuals and Training
Prerequisite/Minimum Provider Qualifications
Bachelor's degree plus training and experience in sexual health/family planning with adolescents and young adults
Manual Information
There is a manual that describes how to deliver this program.
Program Manual(s)
Manual information:
- Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, J. (2016). Safer Sex Intervention (SSI).
The manual is available for a fee, on request via email to SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Training Information
There is training available for this program.
Training Contact
-
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
Title: Developer, Safer Sex Intervention
Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Phone: (617) 355-8306
Training Type/Location:
Arrangements for training must be made with Dr. Shrier or her delegate. Training can be provided on-site or in Boston, depending on logistics.
Number of days/hours:
1.5 days for train-the-facilitator training, 2 days for train-the-trainer training, and half a day for the motivational interviewing workshop
"What is included the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research
"What is included in the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V. M., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, S. J. (2001). Randomized controlled trial of a Safer Sex Intervention for high-risk adolescent girls. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.1.73
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 123
Population:
- Age — Not specified
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were adolescents with cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Location/Institution: Urban children's hospital adolescent clinic and inpatient service
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of an individualized Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on condom use and recurrent sexually transmitted disease (STD) among female adolescents diagnosed as having an STD. Participants were randomized to receive SSI or standard care. Measures utilized include a sociodemographic interview, and a self-administered, 62-item questionnaire that used items from previously validated surveys and questions about age of first sexual intercourse, number of sexual partners (lifetime and past 3 months), use of alcohol or other drugs before sexual intercourse (ever and the last time), and condom use with last sexual intercourse was adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Results indicate that at 1 month, compared with control participants, SSI participants had increased sexual risk knowledge and more positive attitudes toward condoms and tended to use condoms more with a nonmain partner. At 6 months, fewer SSI participants than controls had sex with a nonmain sexual partner in the previous 6 months. At 12 months from baseline, SSI participants were less likely to have a current main partner and had a lower rate of recurrent STD than controls, but these differences were not significant. Limitations include that the sample was drawn largely from an urban pediatric hospital’s general adolescent clinic and might not be representative of other adolescent populations; concerns about the reliability of the outcome measures; that the reliability and validity of the measures have not been reported; and that the sample size was small. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 months.
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Kelsey, M., Walker, J. T., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Juras, R. (2016). Replicating the Safer Sex Intervention: 9-Month impact findings of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S1), S53–S59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303372
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 1,809
Population:
- Age — 13-20 years
- Race/Ethnicity — 35% Non-Hispanic Black, 32.6% Non-Hispanic White, 18.4% Hispanic, and 13.5% Other
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were sexually active female adolescents.
Location/Institution: Minnesota, Tennessee, Florida
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to test the effects of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on female adolescents’ sexual behavior and possible antecedents of behavior such as sexual health attitudes, knowledge, motivation, intentions, and skills. Participants were randomized into SSI or to no intervention. Measures utilized include study-developed measures regarding the following: 1) currently sexually active (in the past 90 days); 2) sexual intercourse without birth control in the past 90 days; 3) sexual intercourse in the past 90 days; 4) oral sex in the past 90 days; 5) anal sex in the past 90 days; 6) sexual intercourse without a condom in the past 90 days; 7) oral sex with a condom in the past 90 days; 8) anal sex without a condom in the past 90 days; 9) sexual intercourse with more than one partner (lifetime) and 10) sexual intercourse with more than five partners (lifetime). Results indicate that compared with control participants, SSI participants were less likely to have sexual intercourse without birth control, more likely to report positive attitudes toward protection and intention to use condoms, and more confident of their ability to refuse sex. SSI did not affect sexual risk knowledge or motivation to delay childbearing. Positive impacts on sexual behavior and sexual risk were observed among key subgroups of youths who were aged 18 years or older, Hispanic, not sexually experienced at baseline, and enrolled at the Minnesota site. Limitations include the lack of generalizability of study findings to other ethnicities and genders and the use of study-developed measures. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 9 months.
Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research
"What is included in the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V. M., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, S. J. (2001). Randomized controlled trial of a Safer Sex Intervention for high-risk adolescent girls. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.1.73
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 123
Population:
- Age — Not specified
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were adolescents with cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Location/Institution: Urban children's hospital adolescent clinic and inpatient service
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of an individualized Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on condom use and recurrent sexually transmitted disease (STD) among female adolescents diagnosed as having an STD. Participants were randomized to receive SSI or standard care. Measures utilized include a sociodemographic interview, and a self-administered, 62-item questionnaire that used items from previously validated surveys and questions about age of first sexual intercourse, number of sexual partners (lifetime and past 3 months), use of alcohol or other drugs before sexual intercourse (ever and the last time), and condom use with last sexual intercourse was adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Results indicate that at 1 month, compared with control participants, SSI participants had increased sexual risk knowledge and more positive attitudes toward condoms and tended to use condoms more with a nonmain partner. At 6 months, fewer SSI participants than controls had sex with a nonmain sexual partner in the previous 6 months. At 12 months from baseline, SSI participants were less likely to have a current main partner and had a lower rate of recurrent STD than controls, but these differences were not significant. Limitations include that the sample was drawn largely from an urban pediatric hospital’s general adolescent clinic and might not be representative of other adolescent populations; concerns about the reliability of the outcome measures; that the reliability and validity of the measures have not been reported; and that the sample size was small. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 months.
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Kelsey, M., Walker, J. T., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Juras, R. (2016). Replicating the Safer Sex Intervention: 9-Month impact findings of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S1), S53–S59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303372
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 1,809
Population:
- Age — 13-20 years
- Race/Ethnicity — 35% Non-Hispanic Black, 32.6% Non-Hispanic White, 18.4% Hispanic, and 13.5% Other
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were sexually active female adolescents.
Location/Institution: Minnesota, Tennessee, Florida
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to test the effects of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on female adolescents’ sexual behavior and possible antecedents of behavior such as sexual health attitudes, knowledge, motivation, intentions, and skills. Participants were randomized into SSI or to no intervention. Measures utilized include study-developed measures regarding the following: 1) currently sexually active (in the past 90 days); 2) sexual intercourse without birth control in the past 90 days; 3) sexual intercourse in the past 90 days; 4) oral sex in the past 90 days; 5) anal sex in the past 90 days; 6) sexual intercourse without a condom in the past 90 days; 7) oral sex with a condom in the past 90 days; 8) anal sex without a condom in the past 90 days; 9) sexual intercourse with more than one partner (lifetime) and 10) sexual intercourse with more than five partners (lifetime). Results indicate that compared with control participants, SSI participants were less likely to have sexual intercourse without birth control, more likely to report positive attitudes toward protection and intention to use condoms, and more confident of their ability to refuse sex. SSI did not affect sexual risk knowledge or motivation to delay childbearing. Positive impacts on sexual behavior and sexual risk were observed among key subgroups of youths who were aged 18 years or older, Hispanic, not sexually experienced at baseline, and enrolled at the Minnesota site. Limitations include the lack of generalizability of study findings to other ethnicities and genders and the use of study-developed measures. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 9 months.
Additional References
-
Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014). Implementing three evidence-based program models: Early lessons from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Replication Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(3, Suppl), S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024
-
Kelsey, M., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Francis, K. (2018). Safer Sex Intervention final impact report: Findings from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Abt Associates Inc. https://aspe.hhs.gov/teen-pregnancy-prevention-tpp-replication-study
-
Remz, G., & Tilchin, R. (n.d.). Sexual health education: Minneapolis, MN. Results for America. https://catalog.results4america.org/case-studies/sexual-health-minneapolis
Additional References
-
Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014). Implementing three evidence-based program models: Early lessons from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Replication Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(3, Suppl), S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024
-
Kelsey, M., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Francis, K. (2018). Safer Sex Intervention final impact report: Findings from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Abt Associates Inc. https://aspe.hhs.gov/teen-pregnancy-prevention-tpp-replication-study
-
Remz, G., & Tilchin, R. (n.d.). Sexual health education: Minneapolis, MN. Results for America. https://catalog.results4america.org/case-studies/sexual-health-minneapolis
Topic Areas
Child Welfare System Relevance Level
Low
Topic Areas
Child Welfare System Relevance Level
Low
Target Population
Sexually active female adolescents and young adults
For children/adolescents ages: 13 - 23
Target Population
Sexually active female adolescents and young adults
For children/adolescents ages: 13 - 23
Program Overview
The Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) is designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors among young women at risk for adverse reproductive health outcomes. The sexual risk behaviors addressed include having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception. SSI is administered one-on-one and face-to-face by a female health educator in a clinical setting. The 30- to 50-minute session follows one of two intervention guides, selected based on the young person's stage of behavior change. Booster sessions are offered at 1, 3, and 6 months postintervention.
Program Overview
The Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) is designed to reduce sexual risk behaviors among young women at risk for adverse reproductive health outcomes. The sexual risk behaviors addressed include having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception. SSI is administered one-on-one and face-to-face by a female health educator in a clinical setting. The 30- to 50-minute session follows one of two intervention guides, selected based on the young person's stage of behavior change. Booster sessions are offered at 1, 3, and 6 months postintervention.
Contact Information
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
- Agency/Affiliation: Boston Children's Hospital
- Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
- Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
- Phone: (617) 355-8306
Contact Information
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
- Agency/Affiliation: Boston Children's Hospital
- Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
- Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
- Phone: (617) 355-8306
Program Goals
The goals of the Safer Sex Intervention are:
- Reduce sexual risk behaviors, including sex without a condom, sex with a nonmain partner, and sex without contraception
- Improve safer sex attitudes and intentions, including positive attitudes toward condoms, intention to use condoms, and intention to use contraception
- Reduce adverse reproductive health outcomes, including repeat sexually transmitted infection (STI), any incident STI, and unplanned pregnancy
Program Goals
The goals of the Safer Sex Intervention are:
- Reduce sexual risk behaviors, including sex without a condom, sex with a nonmain partner, and sex without contraception
- Improve safer sex attitudes and intentions, including positive attitudes toward condoms, intention to use condoms, and intention to use contraception
- Reduce adverse reproductive health outcomes, including repeat sexually transmitted infection (STI), any incident STI, and unplanned pregnancy
Logic Model
Logic Model
Essential Components
The essential components of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) include:
- Administers sessions on a one-on-one and face-to-face basis with a female health educator in a clinical setting
- Uses one 30-50 minute session to evaluate the young woman and administer the main session of SSI
- Evaluates a young person's stage of behavior change about sexual risk behaviors (e.g., having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception) using self-reporting and health evaluator input
- Uses the evaluation to place the young person into one of two categories based on their stage of behavior change
- Uses the SSI guide that is appropriate for the young person's stage of behavior change category
- Draws on behavior change theory and approaches to counseling (Social Cognitive Theory, Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, Motivational Interviewing)
- Includes information and activities in the SSI guides that are related to condom use, contraception, and sexual refusal
- Provides booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months or at similar intervals aligned with other aspects of care
Essential Components
The essential components of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) include:
- Administers sessions on a one-on-one and face-to-face basis with a female health educator in a clinical setting
- Uses one 30-50 minute session to evaluate the young woman and administer the main session of SSI
- Evaluates a young person's stage of behavior change about sexual risk behaviors (e.g., having sex without a condom, having sex with a nonmain partner, and having sex without contraception) using self-reporting and health evaluator input
- Uses the evaluation to place the young person into one of two categories based on their stage of behavior change
- Uses the SSI guide that is appropriate for the young person's stage of behavior change category
- Draws on behavior change theory and approaches to counseling (Social Cognitive Theory, Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change, Motivational Interviewing)
- Includes information and activities in the SSI guides that are related to condom use, contraception, and sexual refusal
- Provides booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months or at similar intervals aligned with other aspects of care
Program Delivery
Child/Adolescent Services
Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) directly provides services to children and addresses the following:
- Sexual risk behaviors
Recommended Intensity
One 30- to 50-minute session Three 15- to 20-minute booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months
Recommended Duration
6 months (but for individuals not willing or able to follow-up, may be as short as a single session)
Delivery Settings
This program is typically conducted in a(n):
- Outpatient Clinic
Homework
This program does not include a homework component.
Resources Needed to Run Program
The typical resources for implementing the program are:
Personnel and a private room
Program Delivery
Child/Adolescent Services
Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) directly provides services to children and addresses the following:
- Sexual risk behaviors
Recommended Intensity
One 30- to 50-minute session Three 15- to 20-minute booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months
Recommended Duration
6 months (but for individuals not willing or able to follow-up, may be as short as a single session)
Delivery Settings
This program is typically conducted in a(n):
- Outpatient Clinic
Homework
This program does not include a homework component.
Resources Needed to Run Program
The typical resources for implementing the program are:
Personnel and a private room
Manuals and Training
Prerequisite/Minimum Provider Qualifications
Bachelor's degree plus training and experience in sexual health/family planning with adolescents and young adults
Manual Information
There is a manual that describes how to deliver this program.
Program Manual(s)
Manual information:
- Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, J. (2016). Safer Sex Intervention (SSI).
The manual is available for a fee, on request via email to SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Training Information
There is training available for this program.
Training Contact
-
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
Title: Developer, Safer Sex Intervention
Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Phone: (617) 355-8306
Training Type/Location:
Arrangements for training must be made with Dr. Shrier or her delegate. Training can be provided on-site or in Boston, depending on logistics.
Number of days/hours:
1.5 days for train-the-facilitator training, 2 days for train-the-trainer training, and half a day for the motivational interviewing workshop
"What is included the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
Manuals and Training
Prerequisite/Minimum Provider Qualifications
Bachelor's degree plus training and experience in sexual health/family planning with adolescents and young adults
Manual Information
There is a manual that describes how to deliver this program.
Program Manual(s)
Manual information:
- Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, J. (2016). Safer Sex Intervention (SSI).
The manual is available for a fee, on request via email to SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Training Information
There is training available for this program.
Training Contact
-
Lydia A. Shrier, MD, MPH
Title: Developer, Safer Sex Intervention
Website: https://www.childrenshospital.org/programs/safer-sex-intervention-program
Email: SaferSex@childrens.harvard.edu
Phone: (617) 355-8306
Training Type/Location:
Arrangements for training must be made with Dr. Shrier or her delegate. Training can be provided on-site or in Boston, depending on logistics.
Number of days/hours:
1.5 days for train-the-facilitator training, 2 days for train-the-trainer training, and half a day for the motivational interviewing workshop
"What is included the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research
"What is included in the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V. M., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, S. J. (2001). Randomized controlled trial of a Safer Sex Intervention for high-risk adolescent girls. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.1.73
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 123
Population:
- Age — Not specified
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were adolescents with cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Location/Institution: Urban children's hospital adolescent clinic and inpatient service
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of an individualized Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on condom use and recurrent sexually transmitted disease (STD) among female adolescents diagnosed as having an STD. Participants were randomized to receive SSI or standard care. Measures utilized include a sociodemographic interview, and a self-administered, 62-item questionnaire that used items from previously validated surveys and questions about age of first sexual intercourse, number of sexual partners (lifetime and past 3 months), use of alcohol or other drugs before sexual intercourse (ever and the last time), and condom use with last sexual intercourse was adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Results indicate that at 1 month, compared with control participants, SSI participants had increased sexual risk knowledge and more positive attitudes toward condoms and tended to use condoms more with a nonmain partner. At 6 months, fewer SSI participants than controls had sex with a nonmain sexual partner in the previous 6 months. At 12 months from baseline, SSI participants were less likely to have a current main partner and had a lower rate of recurrent STD than controls, but these differences were not significant. Limitations include that the sample was drawn largely from an urban pediatric hospital’s general adolescent clinic and might not be representative of other adolescent populations; concerns about the reliability of the outcome measures; that the reliability and validity of the measures have not been reported; and that the sample size was small. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 months.
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Kelsey, M., Walker, J. T., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Juras, R. (2016). Replicating the Safer Sex Intervention: 9-Month impact findings of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S1), S53–S59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303372
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 1,809
Population:
- Age — 13-20 years
- Race/Ethnicity — 35% Non-Hispanic Black, 32.6% Non-Hispanic White, 18.4% Hispanic, and 13.5% Other
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were sexually active female adolescents.
Location/Institution: Minnesota, Tennessee, Florida
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to test the effects of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on female adolescents’ sexual behavior and possible antecedents of behavior such as sexual health attitudes, knowledge, motivation, intentions, and skills. Participants were randomized into SSI or to no intervention. Measures utilized include study-developed measures regarding the following: 1) currently sexually active (in the past 90 days); 2) sexual intercourse without birth control in the past 90 days; 3) sexual intercourse in the past 90 days; 4) oral sex in the past 90 days; 5) anal sex in the past 90 days; 6) sexual intercourse without a condom in the past 90 days; 7) oral sex with a condom in the past 90 days; 8) anal sex without a condom in the past 90 days; 9) sexual intercourse with more than one partner (lifetime) and 10) sexual intercourse with more than five partners (lifetime). Results indicate that compared with control participants, SSI participants were less likely to have sexual intercourse without birth control, more likely to report positive attitudes toward protection and intention to use condoms, and more confident of their ability to refuse sex. SSI did not affect sexual risk knowledge or motivation to delay childbearing. Positive impacts on sexual behavior and sexual risk were observed among key subgroups of youths who were aged 18 years or older, Hispanic, not sexually experienced at baseline, and enrolled at the Minnesota site. Limitations include the lack of generalizability of study findings to other ethnicities and genders and the use of study-developed measures. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 9 months.
Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research
"What is included in the Relevant Published, Peer-Reviewed Research section?"
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Shrier, L. A., Ancheta, R., Goodman, E., Chiou, V. M., Lyden, M. R., & Emans, S. J. (2001). Randomized controlled trial of a Safer Sex Intervention for high-risk adolescent girls. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.155.1.73
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 123
Population:
- Age — Not specified
- Race/Ethnicity — Not specified
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were adolescents with cervicitis or pelvic inflammatory disease (PID).
Location/Institution: Urban children's hospital adolescent clinic and inpatient service
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of an individualized Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on condom use and recurrent sexually transmitted disease (STD) among female adolescents diagnosed as having an STD. Participants were randomized to receive SSI or standard care. Measures utilized include a sociodemographic interview, and a self-administered, 62-item questionnaire that used items from previously validated surveys and questions about age of first sexual intercourse, number of sexual partners (lifetime and past 3 months), use of alcohol or other drugs before sexual intercourse (ever and the last time), and condom use with last sexual intercourse was adapted from the Youth Risk Behavior Survey. Results indicate that at 1 month, compared with control participants, SSI participants had increased sexual risk knowledge and more positive attitudes toward condoms and tended to use condoms more with a nonmain partner. At 6 months, fewer SSI participants than controls had sex with a nonmain sexual partner in the previous 6 months. At 12 months from baseline, SSI participants were less likely to have a current main partner and had a lower rate of recurrent STD than controls, but these differences were not significant. Limitations include that the sample was drawn largely from an urban pediatric hospital’s general adolescent clinic and might not be representative of other adolescent populations; concerns about the reliability of the outcome measures; that the reliability and validity of the measures have not been reported; and that the sample size was small. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 3 months.
-
Note: The following study was not included in rating Safer Sex Intervention on the Scientific Rating Scale.
Kelsey, M., Walker, J. T., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Juras, R. (2016). Replicating the Safer Sex Intervention: 9-Month impact findings of a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Public Health, 106(S1), S53–S59. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303372
Type of Study: Randomized controlled trial
Number of participants: 1,809
Population:
- Age — 13-20 years
- Race/Ethnicity — 35% Non-Hispanic Black, 32.6% Non-Hispanic White, 18.4% Hispanic, and 13.5% Other
- Gender — 100% Female
- Status — Participants were sexually active female adolescents.
Location/Institution: Minnesota, Tennessee, Florida
Summary:
The purpose of the study was to test the effects of the Safer Sex Intervention (SSI) on female adolescents’ sexual behavior and possible antecedents of behavior such as sexual health attitudes, knowledge, motivation, intentions, and skills. Participants were randomized into SSI or to no intervention. Measures utilized include study-developed measures regarding the following: 1) currently sexually active (in the past 90 days); 2) sexual intercourse without birth control in the past 90 days; 3) sexual intercourse in the past 90 days; 4) oral sex in the past 90 days; 5) anal sex in the past 90 days; 6) sexual intercourse without a condom in the past 90 days; 7) oral sex with a condom in the past 90 days; 8) anal sex without a condom in the past 90 days; 9) sexual intercourse with more than one partner (lifetime) and 10) sexual intercourse with more than five partners (lifetime). Results indicate that compared with control participants, SSI participants were less likely to have sexual intercourse without birth control, more likely to report positive attitudes toward protection and intention to use condoms, and more confident of their ability to refuse sex. SSI did not affect sexual risk knowledge or motivation to delay childbearing. Positive impacts on sexual behavior and sexual risk were observed among key subgroups of youths who were aged 18 years or older, Hispanic, not sexually experienced at baseline, and enrolled at the Minnesota site. Limitations include the lack of generalizability of study findings to other ethnicities and genders and the use of study-developed measures. Note: This article was not used in the rating process due to criteria on the Scientific Rating Scale which requires that outcome measures be reliable and valid, and administered consistently and accurately across all subjects.
Length of controlled postintervention follow-up: 9 months.
Additional References
-
Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014). Implementing three evidence-based program models: Early lessons from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Replication Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(3, Suppl), S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024
-
Kelsey, M., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Francis, K. (2018). Safer Sex Intervention final impact report: Findings from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Abt Associates Inc. https://aspe.hhs.gov/teen-pregnancy-prevention-tpp-replication-study
-
Remz, G., & Tilchin, R. (n.d.). Sexual health education: Minneapolis, MN. Results for America. https://catalog.results4america.org/case-studies/sexual-health-minneapolis
Additional References
-
Kelsey, M., & Layzer, J. (2014). Implementing three evidence-based program models: Early lessons from the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Replication Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(3, Suppl), S45–S52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2013.12.024
-
Kelsey, M., Layzer, J., Price, C., & Francis, K. (2018). Safer Sex Intervention final impact report: Findings from the teen pregnancy prevention replication study. Abt Associates Inc. https://aspe.hhs.gov/teen-pregnancy-prevention-tpp-replication-study
-
Remz, G., & Tilchin, R. (n.d.). Sexual health education: Minneapolis, MN. Results for America. https://catalog.results4america.org/case-studies/sexual-health-minneapolis
Date CEBC Staff Last Reviewed Research: September 2017
Date Program's Staff Last Reviewed Content: January 2025
Date Originally Loaded onto CEBC: November 2018