Ohio Youth Problems, Functioning, and Satisfaction Scales (Ohio Scales)
Description / Purpose:
The Ohio Scales assess outcomes for youth ages 5 to 18 who receive mental health services.
Note: The Ohio Scales were not responsive to the CEBC's inquiry. The following information was obtained from publicly available sources.
The Ohio Scales are instruments developed to measure outcomes for youth ages 5 to 18 who receive mental health services. The Short Forms of the Ohio Scales consist of 4 domains: the 20-item Functioning Scale, the 4-item Hopefulness Scale, the 4-item Satisfaction Scale, the 20-item Problem Severity Scale, and the Restrictiveness of Living Scale for agency workers.
Target Population: Children and adolescents ages 5 to 18 years with severe emotional and behavioral problems
Time to Administer: 15 minutes
Completed By: Three separate forms for caregiver, youth, and agency worker. Caregiver and youth self-report forms contain all four content areas and the agency worker form substitutes the Hopefulness and Satisfaction Scales for the Restrictiveness of Living Scale.
Modalities Available: Print and computer
Scoring Information: Scoring tools and guidelines are available on the website. The reporter rates each item on a six-point scale, from zero "not at all" to "five all the time" in the last 30 days. Scoring is the sum of all items on the scale.
Languages Available: Chinese, English, Japanese, Korean, Russian, Spanish
Training Requirements for Intended Users: Minimal clinical training for agency workers, caregiver and youth are self-reported. Training video and other materials are available for download on the website.
Availability: Free for download on website for Ohio providers, however non-Ohio users must sign a licensing agreement and be charged a nominal fee for using measure.
Summary of Relevant Psychometric Research
This tool has received the Measurement Tools Rating of "A – Psychometrics Well-Demonstrated" based on the published, peer-reviewed research available. The tool must have 2 or more published, peer-reviewed studies that have established the measure’s psychometrics (e.g., reliability and validity, sensitivity and specificity, etc.). Please see the Measurement Tools Rating Scale for more information.
Show relevant research...
Turchik, J. A., Karpenko, V., & Ogles, B. M. (2007). Further evidence of the utility and validity of a measure of outcome for children and adolescents. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 15(2), 119-128.
Participants — 3,569 youth ages 5-18 receiving outpatient mental health services
Race/Ethnicity — 38% Caucasian, 37% Hispanic, 11% African American, 0.6% Native American, and 0.9% Asian American. The remaining percentage was unavailable due to missing data in youth self-reports.
Convergent validity of the Ohio Scales was explored by examining the relationship between the scales and subscales–scores generated by parents, agency workers, and youth of the Ohio Scales and Diagnostic and Statistics Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM–IV) diagnoses in a sample of 3,569 youth ages 5 to 18 across parent, agency worker, and youth reports. The Ohio Scales demonstrated evidence of convergent validity when predicted relationships between the scales and diagnoses were examined. The Ohio Scales also showed evidence of differentiating among broad diagnostic categories.
Dowell, K. A. & Ogles, B. M. (2008). The Ohio Scales Youth Form: Expansion and validation of a self-report outcome measure for young children. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 17(3), 291-305.
Participants — 147 children receiving outpatient mental health services
Race/Ethnicity — 74% Caucasian, 22% African American, and the remaining 4% consisted of Native American or other minority
The Ohio Scales Problem Severity Scale was administered to a clinical and comparison sample of children, ages 8â€“11, then re-administered 1 week later to a subsample of children in order to examine test-retest reliability. The Ohio Scales demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and reliability. The Ohio Scales was signiï¬cantly correlated with the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC)Â across both samples, providing evidence for concurrent validity. Children of the clinical sample reported higher scores (i.e., more symptomatic) than the children of the comparison sample on the Ohio Scales, thereby demonstrating construct validity.
Ogles, B. M., Melendez, G., Davis, D. C., & Lunnen, K. M. (2001). The Ohio Scales: Practical outcome assessment. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 10(2), 199-212.
Participants — 2,986 youth, parents, and agency workers
Race/Ethnicity — Not given
The development and initial psychometric studies for the Ohio Scales are described. The Ohio Scales were developed to be practical yet rigorous, multi-content, multi-source measures of outcome for children and adolescents receiving mental health services. Initial studies suggest that the Ohio Scales are promising measures (reliable, valid, and sensitive to change) that can be used to track the effectiveness of mental health interventions for youth with serious emotional disorders. Additional studies are warranted to expand the situations and populations within which the scales are valid.
Date Reviewed: February 2015 (Originally reviewed in August 2011)