Supporting Father Involvement
Primarily low-income families
Father Involvement Interventions are defined by the CEBC as programs that aim to increase fathers' active and positive engagement in their children's lives. Father-focused programs promote involvement, provide support and education, teach fathers new parenting skills, and strengthen families. While all such programs directly or indirectly seek to prevent child abuse or neglect, some programs specifically aim to treat abuse. Studies have shown that when fathers have positive relationships with their children, it can have positive effects on their children's behavior, social skills, cognitive development, and academic achievement. Children with involved fathers tend to do better in school, have better grades, and are less likely to be expelled and/or repeat grades. In addition, higher levels of father involvement are associated with lower levels of child neglect, and children who live in fatherless households often face higher risks of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect than children who live in households with a father present.
Father Involvement Interventions are defined by the CEBC as programs that aim to increase fathers' active and positive engagement in their children's lives. Father-focused programs promote involvement, provide support and education, teach fathers new parenting skills, and strengthen families. While all such programs directly or indirectly seek to prevent child abuse or neglect, some programs specifically aim to treat abuse. Studies have shown that when fathers have positive relationships with their children, it can have positive effects on their children's behavior, social skills, cognitive development, and academic achievement. Children with involved fathers tend to do better in school, have better grades, and are less likely to be expelled and/or repeat grades. In addition, higher levels of father involvement are associated with lower levels of child neglect, and children who live in fatherless households often face higher risks of physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect than children who live in households with a father present.
Primarily low-income families
Couples that just became first-time parents and could use assistance in developing the father's role in parenthood
Parents/Caregivers and their young children (0-3)
Fathers with children age 18 or younger; designed for custodial and noncustodial fathers with instructions on how to deliver it most effectively to non-custodial and unemployed and underemployed fathers
Dads-to-be in the months surrounding their baby's birth
Fathers (including biological, step, and common-law) who have who have physically abused, emotionally abused, or neglected their children; exposed their children to domestic violence; or who are deemed to be at high-risk for these behaviors
Men and others in parental roles with children ages 0-25
Preschool teachers
Incarcerated fathers with children 18 years old and younger, designed specifically for the issues/challenges faced by incarcerated fathers (e.g., challenge of successful reentry)
Fathers, significant others, and at-risk children
Low-income fathers, primarily noncustodial
Primarily low-income families
Couples that just became first-time parents and could use assistance in developing the father's role in parenthood
Parents/Caregivers and their young children (0-3)
Fathers with children age 18 or younger; designed for custodial and noncustodial fathers with instructions on how to deliver it most effectively to non-custodial and unemployed and underemployed fathers
Dads-to-be in the months surrounding their baby's birth
Fathers (including biological, step, and common-law) who have who have physically abused, emotionally abused, or neglected their children; exposed their children to domestic violence; or who are deemed to be at high-risk for these behaviors
Men and others in parental roles with children ages 0-25
Preschool teachers
Incarcerated fathers with children 18 years old and younger, designed specifically for the issues/challenges faced by incarcerated fathers (e.g., challenge of successful reentry)
Fathers, significant others, and at-risk children
Low-income fathers, primarily noncustodial
The Father Involvement Interventions topic area is relevant to child welfare because to truly create a system that supports the best interests of children in out-of-home care, states and counties need to prioritize strategies that create equal access for fathers to be meaningfully involved in the lives of their children, and thus maximize the likelihood that the goals of safety, permanency and well-being are reached. Historically, mothers have been the primary focus of attention in the child welfare system. This has been mostly due to the fact that a large number of primary caretakers that come to the attention of child welfare are mothers and are seen as the identified client and the target of case plans. Thus, permanency planning has often been limited to targeting mothers and the maternal side of the families. In this mother-centric environment, the child welfare system has been increasingly recognizing the potential of missed opportunities for effective case and permanency planning when they are not actively involving the father and his side of the family. Several reports have revealed the lack of meaningful father engagement by child welfare workers. In response to this, the Children's Bureau, through its Child and Family Services Review (CFSR), now includes an assessment of the degree of father involvement as part of their review process of state child welfare systems. As other studies reveal, when fathers become positively involved, the likelihood of better outcomes increases.
Jorge Cabrera
Senior Director
Casey Family Programs
San Diego, CA
The Father Involvement Interventions topic area is relevant to child welfare because to truly create a system that supports the best interests of children in out-of-home care, states and counties need to prioritize strategies that create equal access for fathers to be meaningfully involved in the lives of their children, and thus maximize the likelihood that the goals of safety, permanency and well-being are reached. Historically, mothers have been the primary focus of attention in the child welfare system. This has been mostly due to the fact that a large number of primary caretakers that come to the attention of child welfare are mothers and are seen as the identified client and the target of case plans. Thus, permanency planning has often been limited to targeting mothers and the maternal side of the families. In this mother-centric environment, the child welfare system has been increasingly recognizing the potential of missed opportunities for effective case and permanency planning when they are not actively involving the father and his side of the family. Several reports have revealed the lack of meaningful father engagement by child welfare workers. In response to this, the Children's Bureau, through its Child and Family Services Review (CFSR), now includes an assessment of the degree of father involvement as part of their review process of state child welfare systems. As other studies reveal, when fathers become positively involved, the likelihood of better outcomes increases.
Jorge Cabrera
Senior Director
Casey Family Programs
San Diego, CA
The Father Involvement Interventions topic area was added in 2012. Patricia Kohl, PhD was the topic expert and was involved in identifying and rating any of the programs with an original load date in 2012 (as found on the bottom of the program's page on the CEBC) or others loaded earlier and added to this topic area when it launched. The topic area has grown over the years and any programs added since 2012 were identified by CEBC staff, the Scientific Panel, and/or the Advisory Committee. For these programs, Dr. Kohl was not involved in identifying or rating them.
The Father Involvement Interventions topic area was added in 2012. Patricia Kohl, PhD was the topic expert and was involved in identifying and rating any of the programs with an original load date in 2012 (as found on the bottom of the program's page on the CEBC) or others loaded earlier and added to this topic area when it launched. The topic area has grown over the years and any programs added since 2012 were identified by CEBC staff, the Scientific Panel, and/or the Advisory Committee. For these programs, Dr. Kohl was not involved in identifying or rating them.