Skip to content

Definition

Reunification Programs are defined by the CEBC as programs to support the reunification of children and birth families after child welfare involvement. Over 350,000 children were in foster care or other out-of-home placements in the United States in 2022. For 52% of these children, the case goal is reunification (i.e., returning them to their biological parents) as quickly and safely as possible. To assist with reunification, child welfare provides services to the child and the child's parents. These services are time-limited and intended to provide support during the reunification process. They may be geared towards addressing the causes for the child's removal and placement into foster care.

In addition to the programs specifically focused on supporting reunification, which are listed below, it is also important to keep in mind that specific services focused on the reason for removal may need to be put into place during the reunification process. Common services associated with reunification include visitation between parent and child, visitation between siblings (if separated), case management services from the social worker, parent training, anger management, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment for the child and parent(s), and domestic violence services. Please note that many of these areas have been reviewed by the CEBC; please click here for a list of topic areas on the CEBC.

  • Target population: Youth in out-of-home placements and their families
  • Services/types that fit: Services to address the unique needs of each family delivered in individual, group, or family formats such as visitation, case management, education, skill building, and/or service delivery
  • Delivered by: Child welfare workers, mental health professionals, or trained paraprofessionals
  • In order to be included: Program must specifically target reunification supports for youth in out-of-home placements and their families
  • In order to be rated: There must be research evidence (as specified by the Scientific Rating Scale) that examines outcomes related to reunification, such as decreased time to reunification as well as decreased disruptions and maltreatment reports after reunification

Downloadable Topic Area Summary

Definition

Reunification Programs are defined by the CEBC as programs to support the reunification of children and birth families after child welfare involvement. Over 350,000 children were in foster care or other out-of-home placements in the United States in 2022. For 52% of these children, the case goal is reunification (i.e., returning them to their biological parents) as quickly and safely as possible. To assist with reunification, child welfare provides services to the child and the child's parents. These services are time-limited and intended to provide support during the reunification process. They may be geared towards addressing the causes for the child's removal and placement into foster care.

In addition to the programs specifically focused on supporting reunification, which are listed below, it is also important to keep in mind that specific services focused on the reason for removal may need to be put into place during the reunification process. Common services associated with reunification include visitation between parent and child, visitation between siblings (if separated), case management services from the social worker, parent training, anger management, substance abuse treatment, mental health treatment for the child and parent(s), and domestic violence services. Please note that many of these areas have been reviewed by the CEBC; please click here for a list of topic areas on the CEBC.

  • Target population: Youth in out-of-home placements and their families
  • Services/types that fit: Services to address the unique needs of each family delivered in individual, group, or family formats such as visitation, case management, education, skill building, and/or service delivery
  • Delivered by: Child welfare workers, mental health professionals, or trained paraprofessionals
  • In order to be included: Program must specifically target reunification supports for youth in out-of-home placements and their families
  • In order to be rated: There must be research evidence (as specified by the Scientific Rating Scale) that examines outcomes related to reunification, such as decreased time to reunification as well as decreased disruptions and maltreatment reports after reunification

Downloadable Topic Area Summary

Programs

Homebuilders®

Families with children (birth to 18) at imminent risk of placement into, or needing intensive services to return from, foster care, group or residential treatment, psychiatric hospitals, or juvenile justice facilities

Scientific Rating 2

On the Way Home

Middle and high school students (12-18) with, or at-risk for, emotional and behavioral disorders transitioning from residential placements back into the home and community school settings and their caregivers

Scientific Rating 2

Multidimensional Family Recovery

Parents with children from birth to 18 who have come to the attention of, or are involved with, the child welfare system and have at least one parent whose substance use is determined to be a primary child safety risk factor

Scientific Rating 3

Project Connect

High-risk, substance-affected families involved in the child welfare system that may experience poly-substance abuse and dependence, domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, criminal involvement and behavior, poverty, inappropriate housing, lack of education, poor employment skills, impaired parenting, low household income, or single parent household

Scientific Rating 3

The Safe Babies Court Team™

Infants and toddlers up to age 3 coming under court jurisdiction and their families; and professionals engaged in disciplines touching the lives of maltreated infants and toddlers

Scientific Rating 3

LIFE – Live In Family Enhancement

Parents with children ages 0-17 at risk of having their children enter foster care or who are in the process of reunification with their children

Scientific Rating NR

Programs

Homebuilders®

Families with children (birth to 18) at imminent risk of placement into, or needing intensive services to return from, foster care, group or residential treatment, psychiatric hospitals, or juvenile justice facilities

Scientific Rating 2

On the Way Home

Middle and high school students (12-18) with, or at-risk for, emotional and behavioral disorders transitioning from residential placements back into the home and community school settings and their caregivers

Scientific Rating 2

Multidimensional Family Recovery

Parents with children from birth to 18 who have come to the attention of, or are involved with, the child welfare system and have at least one parent whose substance use is determined to be a primary child safety risk factor

Scientific Rating 3

Project Connect

High-risk, substance-affected families involved in the child welfare system that may experience poly-substance abuse and dependence, domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, criminal involvement and behavior, poverty, inappropriate housing, lack of education, poor employment skills, impaired parenting, low household income, or single parent household

Scientific Rating 3

The Safe Babies Court Team™

Infants and toddlers up to age 3 coming under court jurisdiction and their families; and professionals engaged in disciplines touching the lives of maltreated infants and toddlers

Scientific Rating 3

LIFE – Live In Family Enhancement

Parents with children ages 0-17 at risk of having their children enter foster care or who are in the process of reunification with their children

Scientific Rating NR

Why was this topic chosen by the Advisory Committee?

The Reunification Programs topic area is relevant to child welfare because reunification services are legally required as part of child welfare services when a child is removed from their parent(s) or guardian(s). It is important that social workers understand what programs provide evidence-based services that will assist the family in making the necessary changes in order to have their children returned to their physical custody. These services are typically intensive and family-centered.

Danna Fabella, Director, Linkages Project
Child and Family Policy Institute of California
Sacramento, CA

Why was this topic chosen by the Advisory Committee?

The Reunification Programs topic area is relevant to child welfare because reunification services are legally required as part of child welfare services when a child is removed from their parent(s) or guardian(s). It is important that social workers understand what programs provide evidence-based services that will assist the family in making the necessary changes in order to have their children returned to their physical custody. These services are typically intensive and family-centered.

Danna Fabella, Director, Linkages Project
Child and Family Policy Institute of California
Sacramento, CA

Topic Expert

The Reunification Programs topic area was added in 2006. Anthony N. Maluccio, DSW was the topic expert and was involved in identifying and rating any of the programs with an original load date in 2006 (as found on the bottom of the program's page on the CEBC) or others loaded earlier and added to this topic area when it launched. The topic area has grown over the years and any programs added since 2006 were identified by CEBC staff, the Scientific Panel, and/or the Advisory Committee. For these programs, Dr. Maluccio was not involved in identifying or rating them.

Topic Expert

The Reunification Programs topic area was added in 2006. Anthony N. Maluccio, DSW was the topic expert and was involved in identifying and rating any of the programs with an original load date in 2006 (as found on the bottom of the program's page on the CEBC) or others loaded earlier and added to this topic area when it launched. The topic area has grown over the years and any programs added since 2006 were identified by CEBC staff, the Scientific Panel, and/or the Advisory Committee. For these programs, Dr. Maluccio was not involved in identifying or rating them.